WHEN JUDICIARY ITSELF HAS TOO MANY LEGAL PROBLEMS FOR THE COUNTRY TO
HELP THEM

Whom are you trying to kid in the time of crises,  and at the time
when responsibility for 9/11 is not even established. Who do you think
you are? I AM NOT STOPPING ( was hintednow on line to  stop) - YOU ARE
 A PART OF THE US DEMOCRATIC USA GOVERMENT - IF YOUR RULES ARE UNCLEAR
FOR THAT LONG; IF YOU HAVE BECOME MANIPULATIVE TOOL OF THE PRESIDENT
THAT IS GULTY OF 9/11 AND YOU INTEND TO KEEP BOUNCING OUR LAWS TO
LIKINGS OF ALL GUILTY, YOU HAVEHAD BUT ONE SHOT - TO INTERNALLY SOLVE
THE INTERNAL ISSUES OF THE JUDICIARY BUT NOT SPREDA AROUND THAT
WHITEWASH MESS.

                                    For these People that are
                                    affected, and the rest of the Courtman and Women,
                                    that does not yet speak up.

IF YOU NEED A LAWYER ECXUSE SELF FIRST, HANDICAPPED JUDICIARY. YOU
HAVE CAUSED
IMMENSE AMOUND OF LEGAL PRPOBLEMS THAT ARE UNLIKELY TO CLEAR YOU
WHITEWASHING FASCISTS WAY.YOU HOLD ME HOSTAGE 5 Y 8 MONTS ( AND MY
UNDEARAGED THAN KIDS - you are out of your mInd); TRY TO LEAVE ORDERLY
TOGETHER WITH GRACEFULL GREENSBERG, BEFORE JUDGE MOCKER REALLY GETS
HER).

YOU OUT, HANDICAPPS, SO USA  LAWS CAN STAY - YOU HAVE META PROBLEMS
WITHIN
YOUR JUDICIARY CONSTITUTION INYOUR HEAD, THAT IS UNSOLVABLE - TAKE IT
TO GRAVE,
BUT YOURS.

I AM UPHOLDING aMERICAN VALUES IN THIS PROPOSED SOCIAL MOVE WHILE YOU
HOLDING
TO UNWORCABLE AND WRONG.I HAVE NEVER REFUSE THIRD PARTY SETTLEMENTS
AND I HAVE NEVER AUTHORISED ANYBODY TO USE MYN SIGNBITURES AND NOT
REVIEW WHAT YOU SIGN WITH MY SIGNITURES, plus any other probl;ems that
you are making and making up.

IS THAT UNDERSTOOD WHY YOU ARREE RETIRING DFAST NOW? IF NOT, HAVE YOUR
LAWYER CALL ME AND NOT JUDGE MOCKER ( that is by the way against the
Court rules, including the mock Court rules;
you could have watcj=hed the proceedings!
Try to have barberians cointained against any shoting at Judge Mocker;
if you can.

This STILL IS A DEMOCRACY BUT NOT IF YOU STAY LIKER THAT.

For: IHT and Hillary Clinton Buttom

"U.S. court erases ruling that allowed a detention
By Adam Liptak Published: March 7, 2009

The Supreme Court decided Friday to erase a lower-court ruling on
perhaps the most fundamental national security question: Does the
president have the power to order the indefinite military detention of
legal residents of the United States?

The court's action, which had been urged by the Obama administration,
wiped away one of the Bush administration's greatest victories in the
lower courts, a 2008 ruling that expanded the limits of executive
authority to combat terrorism by allowing such detentions.

But the one-paragraph Supreme Court ruling leaves open the question of
whether the military detention of legal residents as enemy combatants
can ever be constitutional. The ruling came in the case of Ali Saleh
Kahlah al-Marri, a citizen of Qatar who was lawfully in the United
States as a student when he was arrested in 2001. The court, which had
agreed to hear Marri's challenge to his detention in December, said it
would not hear the case after all in light of his indictment last week
on criminal charges in federal court.

More significantly, the court erased the lower court ruling in the
case, Al-Marri v. Spagone. Last year, in a fractured decision, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, Virginia,
said the president had the legal authority to detain Marri, subject to
a court hearing on whether he was properly designated an enemy
combatant.

The decision to vacate the lower court's ruling is unusual.
Ordinarily, if the Supreme Court decides not to hear a case, it lets
an appellate court's decision stand, thus leaving is as a precedent
for the region covered by the appellate court, which in this case was
the Fourth Circuit."

HILLARY WOULD DO IT ALONE BY SO CALLED LEGISLATUIIVE PRIVELAGE
EXTENSION, FOR WHICH SHE IS STILL TO SHOW CREDENTIALS. PRIVELEDGES SHE
CAN ONLY TAKE IF SHE DOES NOT HURT THE PARTIES, IN CASE YOU DO NOT
KNOW; IT IS A RISK; I PREFER TO HAVE THE PRIVELEGES
WITH THE PERSONAS THAT HAVE EARNED THEM AND HAVE IT GRANTED
CONSTITUTIONALLY
OR BY COMMON GOOD PRACTICE. TRY NOT TO LOOK AT HER TOO LONG.

HILLARY MIGHT BE DUE FOR THE TRUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL AT THIS TIME
OVER THE
LEGAL COMOTION SHE CAUSED TALKING THIMNGS AND PRIVELEGES, PLUS OTHER
WHATEVER UNAUTHORIZED ACTIONS. YOU MIGHT NOT SIT ON THAT COUNT, IS
THAT UNDERRSTOOD?

Hillary also exploits Yale students with throwing extreme poisons at
me - that privelege in
 her head you do not need too.