Grupy dyskusyjne

COURT JURISDICTION OVER INTERNATIONAL CRIMINALS

	Data: 2009-05-26 14:48:15
Autor: Me
COURT JURISDICTION OVER INTERNATIONAL CRIMINALS
THIS DISCUSSION FOR FAST REFERAL TO ESTABLISH PROPER COURT, UNLESS COURT IN MONTREAL SEEMS BETTER; OR THE TRANSPORT OF SUSPECT BE DONE TO STRASSBURG. ( IF YOU KNOW AT ALL WHAT I MEAN) On May 26, 5:17 pm, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote: ==No Federal Question== In Sam Sloan vs. Paul Truong and Susan Polgar, 08-5813-cv, decided May 8, 2009, Judge Sotomayor ruled that a case involving a defendant who sent out thousands of pornographic newsgroup postings targeting a chess organization that had 30,000 children as members did not present a federal question and thus the federal courts had no jurisdiction to hear such a case. THIS COULD BE DIFFICULT B/C THEY SAND IT FROM SERVER ABROAD OR JUST INCRIPTED SERVER INFORMATION ( MANIPULATED THIS DAYS) AS MIF SEND FROM ABROAD. GREAT THAN BEACUSE SENATE NOW HAS TO APPROVE NON- AMRICAN, PROPERLY DISTRICTED ,SO TO SAY, TERROTORY FOR THE TRUE INTERNATIONAL COURT FOR THE WHOLE WORKD RATHER THAN ANY SINGLE CONTINENET OR CONTINENTS, TO HAVE A REMEDY. BY THE WAY IN THIS CASE 0F COURT IN STRASBURG COULD HAVE A JURISDITION. IT COULD BE THAT THE GAME IS MADE BY PERVERTS TO EXCLUDE THIS MATTER FROM ALL TEH COURTS AS NOBODY UPSTAIRS LIKE TO STICK OUT ON THE MATER AND BE EASY TARGET OF INTERNATIONAL BLACKMAIL BY PERVERTS. AT LAST BIODEN FITS TEH PICTURE, WITH AND WITHOUIT NERECTION Two weeks after making that decision, Judge Sotomayor was nominated to the United States Supreme Court by President Obama. WHY DOES SHE LOOK LIKE SOMEONE ELSE?