NYT: "Mr. Perry and Mrs. Bachmann dismiss evolution as an unproven
theory. "

If THAT IS TRUE ( CAN NOT FOLLOW VERY WELL AS I AM CONSTANTLY THROWN
OF LINE, NO VIDEO TAPE IN THE LIBRARY INTERNET WORKS FOR ME EVEN IF I
GET IT ON LINE; PAPERS ARE NOT AVAILABLE IN THE 'ESTABLISHMENT" I AM
IN EVEN THOUGH THERE IS THE LAW IN THIS MATTER IN THE USA AND EVEN
PRISONERS HAVE TO HAVE DAILY NEWSPAPER AVAILED; THE TV THAT IS
SOMETIMES TURNED ON OR ON THE DISCRETION OF OFFENDING STAFF IS RARELY
ON THE POLITICAL NEWS BUT MUCH RATHER ON THE SITCOME) THAN
AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE REPRESENTATIVES THAT ARE NOT ONLY NOT EDUCATED
BUT NOT WILLING TO CHCEK CURRENT NEWS.

I SAY, 'IF', TRUE, DUE TO THAT BLOCADE OF INFORMATION THAT IS STILL
POSSIBLE EVEN ON ME, A PERSON THAT IS POLITICALLY INVOLVED AND KNOWS
WHERE TO CHECK THE NEWS.

BUT THAN I CAN RUN WITH IT AS UNCHECKED YEASTERDAY, DISTORTED NEWS
BECAUSE THE FELLOW AMERICANS HAVE THESE THINGS ON THE BANNERS WHETHER
CHECKED OR UNCHECKED FOR THE SAKE OF POLITICAL DIVISIONISM, WHILE THE
ISSUE OF EVELUTION VERSUS CREATIONISM IS TATENDED ENOUGH AND HAS
FORMED INFORMED OPINION.

 FOR ME IT IS MORE THAN THE OPINION, BUT LET STAY WITH THE INFORMED
OPINION - THAT ONE IS GOOD  ENOUGH FOR AMERICA.

IT IS IN THIS TOPIC THAT BOTH WAYS OF LIFE DEVELOPMENT ON EARTH ARE
TRUE.
( come in to see life forming while you watch on th Delaware River in
Morrisville or nerby River Line train line - this one be byu creation
in the nano field, but not in any way contradicted by understnding the
evolutionary tree ( although that one has the stock points - these get
resoved by observation of life, itself,  fast). All the current
publications, museum of evolution that appers and diseapers ( in
London), catholic publications ( sic!)
all al of such opinion.