Data: 2011-04-18 07:02:30 | |
Autor: . | |
Dla Konstytutionalistow i politykow a szczegolnie kobiet - przyklad legalnego Bumpa | |
..... ........ 4/18/11 re: Reporting the case of legal bias and
discrimination based in gender. DEAR REPUTABLE FIRM ........... I appreciate you stance of discriminating people. I am reporting the case of Elisabeth Dole, my log time companion and a friend, that one group clearlky discriminates over the other. There are severe personal harms but these Elisabeth will have to cliam; I am urging you to take the case base of the social injury. Elisabeth work is as distinct and is Bob's. Jokers of Capital Hill to obercome the idea that justice applies to them have alredy tries several tricks that do not overcome neither Constitution or the Amendments ( you are the lawyers and be better here but I am bringing this up since I know how they try to overcome blantant acts as this one- by claiming that this is not a job that they had up there, but Elisabeth on her exist was not payed any severance, job no job , to be free to enforce her social position: The jokers of Capital Hill also institutes EEO a new in 2005 or about, only sone of them not knowing that this was on the book long as federal and state laws; whether jokers had in mind that the Staff of the Senator is not to be let go withot Lautenberg law and due process of law thus take over Senators offices, as these ' like Elisabeth, not to have protection, or not - that fact is more than notable in this dispute over how the group treats Elisabeth Dole.( she might have also used Elizabeth name) Of all people on earth Elisabeth would not be the one to tell them as much as I do and yet they took on her. Elisabteh is also Harward graduate lawyer, very articulated and accurate still, even thought she worked in the legislature thus the facto did not practice the law very long ( she was longest servig senator women and the only women Senator in late 70 -ties). I wander if she is not enslaved to even say a word. The last time I spoke with her she was. The rest has to be taken up with her due to confidentiality of procedure and person ( BUT SURE ENOUGH THERE HAS TO BE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE THAT SHE IS HONORED WITHOUT DISCRIMINATION, AT LEAST) As I am not reporting this sitiution and in public not the first time, thus I reserve that this report is immediatelly public. NOTHING PERSONAL. I ALSO TREAT THE RESPECTIVE ADREESSEE CONFIDENTIAL. Definition for public release: "Within sociology, 'discrimination' is the prejudicial treatment of an individual based on their membership in a certain group or category. (Severe disturbancve on line - have to mail as is) THE CATEGORY THAT ESTABLISHES SELF THAT WELL IS MEN OF THE USA SENATE, USA INSTITUTION THAT IS IN CHARGE OF THE OF THE PROPER FORMULATION OF THE LAW THEMSELVES; THUS NOT FOLLOWING OWN MISSION AND PROMISS TO AMERICAN PEOPEL DURING THE ELECTIONS; USING THEIR MANDATES IMPROPERLY. NOTE also that Nancy Pelosi stresses in the public release how much she secures non discrimanation based in gender ( published also via video on U tube and elswhere, how itvsi illegal to discriminate nbased on gendder in USA), thus uses her formal authority to uphold EEO, and other situations, of the Senate, regardles what else they might need to dosclose or not.) THIS ALONE MIGHT BE INTERPRETED AS EXOSTING THE USA JURISDICTION OVER THE MATTER. PLEASE CONSIDER THE RAMIFICATIONS - THE I NETERNATIONAL COURT JURISDICTION, IF YOU DO NOT TAKE THE CASE OR NOT BUT YOU CAN BE THE RESQUER. ISSUE DOES NOT INFLUIENCE USA LESS THAN OTHER DISCRIMINATORY OFFENCES TO THE CONTRARY - USA VIA NGOS AND ALL TYPE OF FOREIGN INVESTMENTS IN CIVIL SOCIETY ALREADY PREVENTED SUCH DISCRIMINATIONS ABROAD. Discrimination is the actual behavior towards members of another group. It involves excluding or restricting members of one group from opportunities that are available to other groups.[2] Moral philosophers have defined it as disadvantageous treatment or consideration. This is a comparative definition. An individual need not be actually harmed in order to be discriminated against. He or she just needs to be treated worse than others for some arbitrary reason." PLEASE FAST LET ME KNOW YOUR POSITION. A............ ...................... ............ ..... |
|
Data: 2011-04-18 16:18:57 | |
Autor: Pacan | |
Dla Konstytutionalistow i politykow a szczegolnie kobiet - przyklad legalnego Bumpa | |
Uzytkownik "." <agnescherry@gmail.com> napisal w
DEAR REPUTABLE FIRM ........... Zdrastwujtie guten tag! ja don't anderstend jazyk inglisz can ju translate into pa russki ? |
|