THEY SOUND SO GOOD; ALL DONE AHEAD OF TRANSPLANTING BRAINS, AND
WITHOUT FORMAL APPROVAL OF US  LEGISLATION.
THEY ALSO HAD SO MANY ANTHOLOGIES AHEAD OF TIME THAT ANY TIME NOW WE
SUMNMARIZE THEM ONLY, IT IS ALREDAY PLAGGED AS IS THE USA NEW HELATH
POLICY.

QUESTION ONLY WAS AND IS: IS HUMAN BRAINS/HEARTS TRANSPLANTING /
LEGITIMATE AND JUSTIFIED?

HERE ARE COINSIDERATIONS THAT READILY WAIGHT AGAINT THESE:

1. FOR CHRONIC CASES - IF TEH EXOSTING SELF ORGANS RUINS DOWN HILL -
LOOSES THE EFICIUENCY IN FUNCTUION WHILE OWNED BY THE PERSON ALL LIFE
THUS FAR (USULLY OLDER AGE)
WHAT THE BODY INTERACTION WITHG THE NEW ORGAN WILL BE.

NO REASEACH IN THAT AREA REGARDLESS THAT WE HAVE GOTTEN UNAPPROVED
PILOT.
HONESTY WILL BE A PROBLEM.

LET SAT THAT HELENA HAS INCREASED THE SPEAD OF PROCESSING WHILE DOING
TEH SAME WORK UPON TRANSPLANT OF 1/2 OF BRAIN ; DID HER OTHER PART
GIVEN TO YOUNG PERSON WORSEN HER PROVCESSING SPEED - IT IS VERY
LIKELY.

BUT IT IS NOT ONLY QUALITY OF TISSUE THAT MATTERS AND NOT ONLY FOR THE
SPEED OF NEURAL; SINGNALING. THERE IS INTERACTION WITH ALL BODY IN
BOTH PERSONS.

  WHAT THE BALANCE BETWEEN GENERATIONS?

 (WATCH THE GENDER EFFECTS - WHILE THE OFFENDERS OF HUMNAN ETHICS WILL
MOST LIKELY SOON AGREE THAT EXCHANGING PARTS OF BRAINS MIGHT NOT WORK
FOR WOMEN AS WELL, IRT DOES THEM OLDIES WANDER IF THE YOUNG WOMEN
BRAIN IS GIVEN TO THEM. WHY THE DIFERENCE (RESERVATIONS MADE AS IT
MOST LIKELY IT IS NOT A TANTAMOUNT GAIN FOR MALE EITHER)
HYPOTHESES:
1. WOMEN STILL IN USA NOT ALOWED  ( LITERRALY6 - NOT ALLOWED - LOOIK,M
AT THE SENATE STRUCTURE; LOK AT THE UNIVERSITIES STRUCTURE; WORSE I8N
USA THAN IN THIRD WORLD CAOUNTRIES; WATCH THE LIE THAT AT THE BEGGING
OF LAST CENTURY WAS MUCH WORSE               FOR WOMEN PROFESSIONALLY
- CHECK THE PAPERS NOT THE UNIVERSITY COURSES – NO OBJECTIVE PICTURE
ANY MORE!)

TO USE THE BRAIN TO THE FULL CAPACITY, WHY AT THE AGE OF ABOUT 50-60
WHEN
OFFENDERS OF 100 YEARS + EXTORT THE BRAIN FROM THEM THEY ACTIVATE THE
UNUSED P
ART VIA GENDER DIFERENCES ( please do not mix getter with the victim
"donor" - same
will not be true for the "giver"; but might be somewhat beneficial to
have young man  acquire
operational patterns of somewhat older and developed scientific brain
for the loss of others like that processing speed and others; these
are not the same comparisons ever).

WHAT THAT BIG LIE WHAT BENEFITTED WHOM AND WHY!
What  is the longitudinal picture - RUNNING OUT OF THE WOMENHOOD AND
THE OPERATIONAL PATTERNS OF WOMEN ALL TOGETHER THUS ALTERING THE
SOCIAL FUNCDTIONS TO THE GREAT DEGREE AND
 CAUSING THE MECHANIZATION OF BRAINS ( WHILE CHIPS ARE RUTINELLY ADDED
NOW FOR ENHANCEMENT OF THE SINGULAR FUNCTIONS, VISION INCLUDED)

2. WHAT ARE THE BENEFICIAL OPERATIONAL PATTERNS OF THE MIDDLE AGED
WOMEN THAT ARE NOW NOT ALLOWED TO WORK BUTB GIVE THE BRAIN TIO
OFFENDERS:

2A.  THE FAMOST MULTILEVEL MANAGEMENT CALLED 'MULTITASKING' THAT MAN
CAN NOT DO BECAUSE HAVE TO CONCENTRATE ON ONE THING ONLY ; WATCH THEM
LIE THAT THEY GOT BEST IN MULTITASKING TOO!

2B. THE ATTENTION TO SOCILA CLUES AND SOCIAL CAUSES ANDS SOCIALLY
DRIVEN
 ACTIONS THAT MEN NARROWING TO THE HIGHT POWER THRUST THAT THEY
CONCENTRATE ON IGNORING LOTS OF 'UNNECESSARY TO THEM DEVELOPMENTS"
( we already less 'socialized' in terms of behavior at least in the
eyes of the external observers,
as the progression of the trend to use women indiscriminatively till
exhausted resource by exploitive pattern!)

2c  MANY OTHERS; lots concerns with unhealthy contracting for sexual
activity using now variety of devices that victimize women and these
who are controlled by satellite trace - ALL THESE DEVICES DEHUMANIZE -
REMOVE HUNMAN ASPECT AND REMOVE DEPT OF CONNECTION AND INTERCATION;
( WHY DEVICES IF PEOPLE ARE TO CONTINUE INTERACT AS HUMANS – BEACYUSE
OFFENDERS HIDE AND HAVE MULTIPLE VICTIMJS)

BUT WATCH JUST TEH HOMOSEXUAL MEN - THEY BE IMPREGNATING WONE, EXCEPT
FOR BIDEN THAT ONLYT STEALS EGGS  IN UNCONSCIEUS WOMEN) TO.... NOT TO
HAVE THE CHILD SEE THE NATURAL PATRENT AFGAIN. WHAT DOES THAT DO IN
TERMS OF SOCIATAL VALUES AND IN TERMS OF THE FUTURE GENERATION
BENEFITING FROM THE LIFE WORK OF THE PARENTS!
  ( CIA now supports such thefts including from women on the job;
QUESTION BEING IF WOMEN NOF CONGRESS ARE ASSULTED THAT WATYA ND DO NOT
EVEN KNOW ; IF WERE TO KNOW IMMEDIATE ATTACK; WHY ELISABETH DOLE OF
ALL WOMEN  DOES NOT EVEN TALK; SHE IS THE ONE WHO NOW ACCORDING AT
LEAST TO PUBLIC BELIEVE AND SENATE LIES WAS THERE THE LONGEST – WHY
SHE DOES NOT MAKE PUBLIC STATEMENTS AT ALL?)

THEY MEAN NOT TO EXCPLAIN DURING THE LENTHY AND CONTROVERSILA MERITAL
STRIVINGS LEGISLATURES, WHERE AND HOW THEY TAKE CHILDREN FROMA ND WHAT
IT MEANS FOR THESE  CHILDREN LIVES!

   WHY PEOPLE DO NOT EVEN TALK ABOUT IT?:

WHAT IS THE PROGRESSION OF THESE OVERTIME ? IS LOS OF HUMAN FEATURES A
CONSIDERATION?

             About

Based at Cal Poly State University (San Luis Obispo), The Nanoethics
Group is a non-partisan organization that studies the ethical and
societal implications of nanotechnology.  We also engage the public as
well as collaborate with nanotech ventures and research institutes on
related issues and initiatives.    Latest

5 Oct 2009: Interview - Daniel Moore (co-author of our forthcoming
nanoethics monograph from Wiley-Blackwell) on human enhancement

1 Oct 2009: Paper - "The Coming Era of Nanomedicine" in The American
Journal of Bioethics

31 Aug 2009: Report - "Ethics of Human Enhancement: 25 Questions &
Answers"

Summer 2009: Paper - "Risk, Precaution, and Emerging Technologies" in
Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology

02 Mar 2009: Press Release - "Human Enhancement and Nanotechnology
Conference to Convene at Western Michigan University"



              Click here for more news.
  Human Enhancement Projects

We recently released a report on the ethics of human enhancement,
funded by the US National Science Foundation. Click here for the
report and here for the press release.

On March 28-29, 2009, we organized a Human Enhancement and
Nanotechnology conference.  Click here for the conference site and
read our press release here.
Nanoethics Books

We are proud to help inform students, policymakers, industry
stakeholders, and the general public on both urgent and distant issues
with our pair of nanoethics anthologies.  Please click here to learn
more.
The following are selected papers we have published.  Please click on
a highlighted link below to read more.
1 Oct 2009
The American Journal for Bioethics
   "The Coming Era of Nanomedicine"
August 2009
NSF Report
   "Ethics of Human Enhancement: 25 Questions & Answers"
Summer 2009
Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology
   "Risk, Precaution, and Emerging Technologies"


December 2008
NanoEthics: Ethics for Technologies that Converge at the Nanoscale
   "Untangling the Debate: The Ethics of Human Enhancement"


1 October 2007
NanoEthics: Ethics for Technologies that Converge at the Nanoscale
   "Nanotechnology Bound: Evaluating the Case for More Regulation"


17 September 2007
The New Atlantis
   "In Defense of Nanoethics: A Reply to Adam Keiper"


3 August 2007
Nanotechnology Now
   "Why the Future Needs Nanoethics" (excerpt from Wiley anthology)


8 January 2007
International Journal of Applied Philosophy
   "What’s So Special about Nanotechnology and Nanoethics?"


December 2006 (abridged)
Utne Reader
   "Cosmic Questions: An ethicist considers law and order on the final
frontier"

July, 2006
Nanotechnology Now
   Report on military nanotechnology


June, 2006
Ethical Corporation Magazine
   "A small but important dimension to corporate responsibility"


May 1, 2006
Genetic Engineering News
   "Nanotechnology in Global Security and Economics: Shifting
Political and Economic Winds, or Firestorm of Change?"


April 24, 2006
Astropolitics
   "Space Ethics: Look Before Taking Another Leap for Mankind"

March 27, 2006
Nanotechnology Perceptions
   "Nano-ethics and Human Enhancement: A Critical Evaluation of Recent
Arguments"

December 5, 2005
The Scientist
   "Nanotechnology's Dilemma"
............
I DO NOT EVEN VBELIEVE THAT ALL THESE BOOKS AND ARTICLES WERE ON THE
MARKET AS THEY POST FIX THESE AFTER THE TROUBLE! WHAT IS THE SUMMOARY
CONCLUSION OF ALL THESE BOOKS AND ARTICLES?