FIVU: SCIENCE ETHICS in their ( OFFENDERS ) logic.

( sorry I can notb edit as tehy locking me out)

WIKIPEDIA:
"Philosophical logic is the study of the more specifically
philosophical aspects of logic. T
he term contrasts with philosophy of logic, metalogic, and
mathematical logic;

Philosophical logic is not concerned with the psychological processes
connected with thought, or with emotions, images and the like. It is
concerned only with those entities — thoughts, sentences, or
propositions — that are capable of being true and false.
PSYCHOLOGY OF THOUGHT IS TRUE OR FALSE, IF YOU ASK ( HAVE THE
CRITERION; ISSUE IN VERY OLD DAYS COULD HAVE BEEN THAT YOU CAN NOT
FASCISISE THE
PUSNISHMENT FOR THE SEPARATED THOGHT THAT EASY FOR NUMBER OF
COGNITIVE  LIMITATIONS ALREADY, NOT BEING ABLE TO SEPARATE THOUGH FROM
THE SYSTEM OF THOUGHTS( and moreover when psychology wa sto be just an
internalized activity)  EMOTIONS NOT BEING RIGHT OR WRONG.
 THOUGHTS AND OTHER PSYCHOLOGICAL PRODUCTS ARE RIGHT AND WRONG, TRUE
AND FALSE AS WELL, DEPENDING ON THE CRITERION.

  ( I encounter this not the first time , that chip community
struggles for such reductionsism that allowes them fantacizing that
they will control human; the rest on the other forum)
.....


Not all philosophical logic, however, applies formal logical
techniques.
iIT DOES TOO TO THE EXTEND THAT THE ABSTRUCT FORM IS ELICITED.
PHILOSPHICAL WRITINGS HAPPEN TO BE HALF CHAOTIC STILL BUT THAT IS THE
OTHER MATTER - THEY ARE NOT EXCEPTED FROM THE LOGIC BY SCIENCE
BOUNDERY - THEY ARE SLOPPY.

...So it could be said that philosophy of logic is a branch of
philosophy but philosophical logic belongs to the domain of logic
(though logic is itself a branch of philosophy).[citation needed]

......

SEVERAL THINGS:

1. Wikipedia is not a science referance but latelly Princeton Uni
selected scientist published self here, comlicating the standard.
Since tehy did - the scrutiny is in fact logical now, o.k?

2. Wkipedia is becaming the fast vehicle to get the attention of
others of all professions, science
could possibly start using it as is the tool of fast reference to
material however biases and unauthored in most cases. Who is that that
asked to give him article stating what he wrote?

3. Wikipedia is easy edited by anyone, only portal ( and or server)
"knowing" who did the edit.
Clever there in Texas, isn't it?

....

THE REST OF THE SCIENTISTS! VULNERABLE SCEINTISTS!

Me and my sons already have most wroting stolen and masacred to the
unregnizable, egz. on teh Theory of Objectivity please read only
original that Rand Foundation still produces, byt the rest is not. The
intelectual property rights are to the original only , giving the new
incestuas style of never ending writing on.

Why did the write the theses and did not give the citation ? - most
likely stolen, and when you give the source - you can sey " good bye"
to the rest. ( AND PLEASE FANTACIZE REST
TO BE ABLE TO PROTECT SELF; IN THELAST 2 YEARS I OBSERVE TORTURING AND
KIDNAPING EVERYS CVIENTISTS Taht thsi scam thinks taht tbhey can abuse
and use; tehn rest they do not know or have no control

THESE SCIENSTISTS ARE KIDNAPPED AND THERE SI NO CONTACT WITH THEM BUT
YOU
READ THEIR SUPPOSE WORKS; IT MIGHT LOOK TO YOU THAT THEY CHANGED AND
HOW - TRICKLED DOWN THOUGHT PROCESS. lOGICAL MAYBE WITHIN THIS
REFERENCE? This scam did this to original works of Russell, only to
state that most
matters that can not write on are not yet understood ( meaning not
undrstood to them
but using Russell to..... be teh first one ever, while yoiu will call,
Rusell with the understood thing.

  ( THAN WHEN YOU KNOW WHEN YOUR ASSCIATE ARE, YOU NOT CONTACTING THEM
AS TEHY BE IMMEDIATELLY PICKED UP BY THESE ILLEGAL SNATCJHERS FROM AS
IT SEEMS NOW, ALL NASAS; YOU BE GOING FOOR BODY PARTS GIVERN ONLY;
AFTER THEY GET ALL OF YOU; IT IS NOT EXAGERRATED - FROM THE SORCE; I
CRIED OT BEFORE AND NO REMEDY - ATTACKED 70 TIMES; IF NOT INTERCEOPT
ALL TEH RST POF MY ORGANS WOULD BE GONE; DO YOU KNIOW AT LEAST WHICH
WORKS ARE MINE)

and please be reminded that they organize raids on the library and
pull down .....
NOT INADEQUATE good books, to fast write them ober the weekend as
fast
compilations with  infinite number of all errors including logical
and...not worry
about that. ( INADEQUATE AND ILLEGAL BOOKS IN DC WERE PULLED
DOWN BY FBI AND  SY)

I think, my fellows, you are guilty too that you allowed that
development; now is very difficult to stop the offence. THIS IS A
COTION TO ALL SCIENTISTS NOT TO EVEN SEPARATE, SEGREGATE AND  ISOLATE
BY THIS SCAM AS LATER IS TOO LATE - NOBODY YET TALKED TO ME FOR ABOUT
3 YAERS WHILE USING MY WORK. AT THE MOMENT
EVEN FBI CAN NOT MOVE ON THEM; OR AT LEAST NOT YET. PLEASE CLARIFY ALL
TRANSACTIONS SO THEY WILL NOT BE MERGING THE PROFESSIONS ON YOU AND
TAKING YOU OVER BY CHANK OF OTHER KNOWLEDGE YOU CROSSREFERENCED
( for ever that is, later only navigated by tthe transplanted chips
and not able to regain own will - see in Washi ngton DC , in cas eyou
can look on teh street and understand what you see, scientists. It is
not " THIS IS NOT ME. TAHT IS THEM ONLY ( ETHICALLY WRONG) , IT
ALREADY IS YOU BEACUSE YOU DO NOT RESPOND, OR MOST OF YOU DO NOT,
RENDERING SELF VULNERABLE)


BY THE WAY LOGIC IS A BRANCH OF PHILOSOPHY, ALL IS FORMAL AND
SYMBOLIC.
PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC IS AT BEST CULDESAC, THE SAME AS LOGIC OF
PHYLOSOPHY.
     ( they intercept me and text is interfered with now)

TE MANIPULATIONS SEEM TO SERVE CHIP CRAVE TO REDUCE ALL TO WHAT
PROCESSABLE BY THE CHIP. AND ALSO FRAGMENT TO UNRECOGNIZABLE  SHAPE AS
CHIPS ARE TO WORK AS SECRET AGENT FOR THAT CLAN WHEN FORCED ON OTHERS

( I had sample of it derived by logic of computer - it was not
connected and extremely aggressive , and structuraly similar to cut
and paste that is not edited in any way; chip was navigated
automatically by Pres. Obama program)

THE CLAIM TAHT LOGIC APPLIES TO ONLY SOME SCEINCES IS INTERNALLY
CONFLICTED ANMD NO SERIOUS PERSON SHOULD BELIEVE THAT , BUT TOO MANY
DO.

WHY? TO HAVE CHIPS WIN OVER YOU AND APPARENTLY AT THIS LAST POINT
THEY ALREADY TRIED.