NYT today: "So it came as a total shock to Elizabeth Adler when she
discovered, through a singer in her favorite a cappella group at Brown
University, that one of the nation’s top medical schools admits a
small number of students every year who have skipped all three
requirements.

(..)

The program promises slots to about 35 undergraduates a year if they
study humanities or social sciences instead of the traditional pre-
medical school curriculum and maintain a 3.5 grade-point average.

For decades, the medical profession has debated whether pre-med
courses and admission tests produce doctors who know their alkyl
halides but lack the sense of mission and interpersonal skills to
become well-rounded, caring, inquisitive healers. "

THIRD ROAD IS EXPOSED BY THE STUDY OF PROCESS, AS THEORETICAL AND
THE VERY PHYSICAL ROAD TO THE NEXT SIGNIFICANT POINT IN THE PROCESS
( SET
SO TO SAY). IT USE TO BE CALLED "RENAISSANCE" ..BUT 'MEN".
THE ISSUE IS THAT BOTH TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PERSON AND TEH
PROFESSIONAL ARE BETTER IS TEHY MEET NOT SEPARATE OR SPLIT THE PERSONS
PERSONALITY AND CAPACITY.

OUT OVERSPECIALISATION ON THE SINGLE SCIENCE SPECIALITY MADE US
DISERVICE; I AM EVEN TORTURED BY NATO THAT CAN NOT GET WHAT WE DO IN
MY VIRTUAL ONLY " UNIVERSITY" WE DO NOT DISCRIMINATE ANY SCEINEC
THERE, BUIT MORE IMPORTANT IS WE DO NOT ARTIFICAILY SEPATE SCIENCE AND
METHODOLOGICALLY REDUCT THE MATTER TO WHAT WE CHOSE TO SEE ( IN TEHSE
SINGLE SCIENCES). THE MIRACLES HAPPEN FAST - OUR HUMAN PERCEPTION
( APPLIES TO ALL SENSES, NOT JUST VISION) EXPANDS SO MAUCH THAT THE
MACHINES AND MACHINE BELIEVERS FRICK ON USA ND WANT TO FIGHT.

PLEASE THIBNK THESE FARTHER

( I personaly was born with the capcity for match and literature and
than purposefully but wrongly separated from the match and phisicka,
while working hum,anities all the time
and 3 years ago they met witin me ( I mean it - that is more or less
accurate - I did not lose the match and physicas skills not working
with them 50 years at all; it seems to me that teh fact that they are
easily foirmalizable sciences enhances taht recandle in me, but I will
not give my head for it as I see the same pattens now at both branches
of the human - the liberal sciences asre sciences and they do deal
with patterns and tehse paterns can be formalized, but is that needed?
What is needed is not to split human mind and not to develop self
restriction in perception amongst many other things. We also do not
need flat bias ( linear),
suface bias ( tahtw e mobe only over the feet line), 3D bias with lack
of linearity be as bad but we do not have it ; and many other issues
of bias on our perception that self limitred us
are worked on by our FIVU with great relief to all.

  These who do not understand what I am conveying need the liberal art
sciences and philosophy. These for them are not any easier than the
hard sciences. The rumor and biases distorted their perceptions, let
say that they are ultim,ate end of science, unless tehy mean it
literally. The worse still remains that NATO thinks that gets these by
torture of other s and in a few min, just like the formulas in
physicas can be given out as a secret that way while the humanoities
patterns hae to be learned over the period of time. Primarily, they
will not propvide the proof of the right to shot down anybody using
the secret weapons - the
very samo NATO does not get this one either.