Data: 2009-10-23 14:15:31 | |
Autor: Me | |
FIVU : books and THE REVOLUTION in the nano and quantum physics | |
(HACKER SDID NOT LEAVE US)
FIRST AMAZON READER INTRODUCES THE "LIGHTNES OF BEING" BY PRASING THE AUTOR AND HIS INDEX. Frank Wilczek has a wonderful sense of humor. I find that I don't have to read any sentence twice to understand the concept. I get it the first time around. It takes true brilliance to convey very complicated concepts simply and with great clarity. I sat down and read this book from cover to cover without putting it down. It covers the evolution of thinking on matter and space from the earliest thinking to today's speculation and theories. The concept of space as a dynamic grid is fascinating. Dr. Wilczek even includes a glossary of terms in the back of the book in case you don't understand the meaning of a particular word or phrase. THIS ONE FROM COSMOLOGIST OF BUSHLAND. SEE - FRANK KNEW EVEN KNEW HOW TO REACH THAT FAR. .. I highly recommend this book to people who want to keep abreast of the latest thinking on this area of physics. It is an informative and engaging read. " RETY!, ME ALMOST FORGOT WHO FRANK IS. NOW, MY INTRODUCTION OF 2 BOOKS THAT COUGHT ATTENTION: 1. PROFESOR WILCZEK introduces the fantasticly light way of accesing the step from the standard model in physic to the...new one. It is inordinary how he pleased both sides. He in fact gave all contextual definition of the systems in conflict and got out whole. ( as you see, I have the slight problem with the recommendation above) We worked for numer of hourse individually and in team when we described the process of nature cycling using teh quntum in the ant; in the light, in the oil. That was a n experience.hE WAS TARGETTED BY STAGNATION AND THE WAY OUT OF THE BIASED CONCEPTUAL CONFLICT IS WITHOUT COMPETITOR YET. THE NEW WRITE UP ON THEORERTICAL PHYSICS THAT CAPTUARES UNIVERSLITY WILL SURELY BE ON THE STYLE OF BARTLAND RUSSELL ( than, not the constantly corrected by Bushland that denies the basic knowledge, not to Berland Russell: Bush people contantly falsify book! Please do not be confused by these - sort it out - look over the concept and even physical edit: I am briging these up now and than as teh damages by these violations of ethics and law, even if Bertland Russell is dead more than 50 yesrzs and nobody survived; dom you believe that!) WHAT IS CONFLICTED: ( from my perspective) : the liniear bias, mecahnics do not conflict with quantum but no modulated concept except for the humor of Dr. Wilczek; the flatness of the perception that we do not need especially in tghe time of the easy inteercelestial travel or even on the intrnet; use of light and "other natural dialogues with the nature" and... more. 2. Brian Clegg "THE GOD EFFECT, Quantum entanglement, science's strangest phenomena, time, travel, teleportation andunltimate computer", ST MARTIN pRESS (hot! ; barely means - changes the date of publication to fit both THE REVOLUTION NEEDS AND THE FIRST EVER CATCHING THE TOPIC) ( hackers getting crazy!) A little ahead of our light experiments atghe FIVU; under the clout that we too sat a ,lot ionn line when the "HART" EXPERIMENT WAS CONDUCTED AND THE LIGHT STATION GAVE OUT THE ANGLES AT WHICH PRISMS PRESENT THEMSELVES TO US. A lettle dificult to track. Professor Clegg , thank you for visiting The Revolution all the way from London. I do not know which being to praise now:) Book is great and educational in popular way. What is revolutionary, unlike in Dr Wilczek method of dealing with the sceinece internal split, is the uniformoty of the understanding about light. That is great. Only thin g is that I have the impression that this underzstanding was achived without travel over Channel, at least we at The FIVU achieved it working hard all last year since teh Hart experiment provocation ( in which squirell drew out redish tint out Hart building , well known since August 2008 and teh first even publication INVISIBLE LIGHT A DAY LATER IN THE TIMES). The other US guilty one is California State University physics lab. We could get them more! Please keep writing. We need it but on time! |
|