"A NASA probe has returned photographs of what appear to be trees on
the surface of Mars.

Š Daily Mail"

Someone stated that thsi si illusion beacuse the photo doe snot revel
steeppness

"It looks like trees standing up but it's really an optical illusion
because you can't tell the steepness of the slopes,"

HOW DOE STHIS GENTELMEN KNOW SLOPES THAN?
WE HAVE FREE  ENTERTEIMENT LIKE THAT ALL THE TIME AND THE SERIOUS
ATTENTION IN
THE MODEL OF PROCESS TO THE ILLUSION INLUDING  VISUAL.

iN THE MODEL OF PROCESS ILLUSION ( A DISCREPARCY BETWEEN "REAL" AS WE
KNOW IT AND
NOT YET THAT). THE ILLUSION HAS THE BOUDERIES 0 - 10% SPECRAL ANGLE
( WE USE LINEARITY
ONLY WHEN IT APLIES , NAMELY TO THE FUNCTION OF THE 2 AGENTS ONLY OR
FOR ANALYTIC
PURPUSE ALONE BUT THAT IS ALREADY OVERDONE).

SINCE ILLUSION DEPENS ON LIGHT, THAT ANGLE IS A CLEAR PLAYER; OR WE
CAN EVEN SAY OTHER
 WAY AS THIS SEEMS REVERSABLE : WE NEED THE LIGHT UNDR CENTRAIN ANGLE
TO CRATE VISULA ILLUSION).
LIGHT IS ALL ABOUT THE ANGLE UNDER WHICH IT FALS OR IS DROWN OR
REFLECTED OR ABSORBED FROM THE OBJECT.
THAT INLUDES INVISIBLE LIGHT THAT INTERCATS WITH THE PRIMARY FORM OF
PLASMA THAT IS INVISIBLE.

( I DID NOT EVEN SAY ANYTHING NEW AS WE HAVE DONE ENOUGHT
EXPERIMENTING WITH PRISMS FOR LIGHT
BUT IT SEEMS BEACUSE THESE MATTERS ARE NOT INTERGRATED OR INTERGRATED
IN THE FRAGMENTED
 WAY ( SORRY FOR THE CONTRADICTION).

THE MODEL OF PROCES SPROVIDES THAT THE ILLUSION VISULA DN ABSTRCT HAS
THE FIRST ASPECT OF REALITY IN IT ALREADY BUT THAT IS A TRANSITIONAL
FORMATION, WHETHER PHYSICAL OR ABSTRUCT.

WHO ANSWERED WHAT ACCURES AFTER THE ILLUSION: O, IS NOT OR IS ... IS
NOT  THE NON-ILLUSION
( NOTICE PLEASE , NO MATTER HOW YOU CUT IT ILLUSION HAS TO DISTRIBUTE
TO THE TWOI ONLY -IT IS BRINKING
THAT W AY; SPEKING OF THE INTERCATION OF THE ILLUSION WITH LIGHT -
GETS REAL - MORE LIGHT IN  OR GIVES IT OUT)

I HOPE THIS IS HELPFULL IN WHAT WE SEE.

THE MOST INTERESTING ASPECT IS THAT THE PRESUMEND "ILLUSION GIVES THE
DIRECTION OF ONE BUNCH OF TREES DOWNWORDSS, WHNE THE DISGONAL IS FLAT
( NOT ARKED AND AT THE DIUFFERET ANGLE TO THE CENTER OF THE
STRUCTURE AT LARGE THAN THE RSET OF TREES.)  DO NOT WANT TI STRUGLE
FOR THE TECHINICAL SINGLE SCIENCE
TERMS AS I DO NOT OPERATE ON THEM AT ALL - I ONLY ANALYZE TEH
PROCESS.

ILLUSIONS WHEN BROKEN DOWN ARE EVEN VISIBLE  AS PLASMA WITH THE
DIVISION LINE.
THEY WERE INVOKED ON SEQUIAS BY THE SENATE DURING TE COUNTER-
REVOLUTIONALY
 SURGE OF THE SCIENCE REVOLUTION, AS EAGLE TAIL BEGGGING TO FORM BY
DROWING
THE LIGHT INTO IT ( FIRST BLUES AND THAN DIFFERENTIATING). THAT ONE
WAS AN ILLUSION
BUT TRUE:)))

THE SEEM TO HAVE RESULTED FROM OVERLASING ONE SPOT WHEN EAGLE HAD THE
NEST DURING THE "CHERRY
REVOLUTION"  AND 50 YEARS AGO, WHILE THE SHOTERS WERE DREADING THE
PICTURE THUS INVOKING
THE VISULA IMAGE NEVERTHELESS.


NEXT TIME FALKS IN HIGH PLACES , BUT UPON THE EFFORD GOT TO BUILD THAT
BIRD WITH
THE DISTANT RADIATION, PERHAPS NSASAS. IT WA SNOT THE NORMAL BIRD. IT
MADE THE
AIR POLUTION. IT WA SAN EXERCISE IN MAKING IT POSSIBLE OR IN INJURING
ME WHEN I STER IT TOO.
( WHAT WAS INTERESTING WA S THAT NSAS MODEL HOW YTO LOAD PARTICLES ON
THE BUILD BIRD ( ALIVE!!!)
WAS REVESIBLE AND AT FIRST LOOKES LIKE SYMETICAL REVERSIBLE SLIME
( THE CAPTURE THAT
APPERS A LOT IN NATURE , BUT ALMOST NOT IN SLIMES - SLIME HAD TO
FREEZE TO GET THAT WAY;
ALWAYS HAT SYMETRICAL - DOES NOT MOVE, DOES NOIT DRAW THE ENERGY;
SLIMES CLEAN THE AIR
WHILE THIS ARTIFICAIL BIRD DIRTIES IT - IT IS NOT ADVISED TO REPEAT -
IT PROBABLY CONTAMINATED
 HUGE AREA; ( i RUN AWAY NOT TO BE INJUR, BUT I DO NOT HAVE ANY
ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE
 WITH HUMAN DOWN THERE BY USA CAPITAL)  IT COULD HAVE BEEN FIRST
EXPERIMENT OF THAT KIND;
THE AREA WAS ALSO ALREADY BADLY CONTAMINATED THUS HAD AVAILABLE DRAW
OF FREE
FLOADING PARTICLES THAT COULD NBE USED IN SYNTHETIZING THE MATTER;
PLEASE DO NOT ASSUME THAT THIS IS THAT  SIMPLE ELSWHERE, BUT IS IS
INTERESTING AS POSSIBILITY;
IT MIGHT BE THAT THE REAL BIRD WAS BUILKD LARGER ONLY - I DO NOT KNOW
- THE PARTY THAT
DID IT APPEARED HOSTILE AND I COULD NOT GET IT FROM THEM  WHAT THEY
WERE DOING.

( hackers alredy distorted text)


   ( WE NEED LEGISLATURE THAT ADDRESSES SUCH USE OF TECHNOLOGY
ESPECIALLY ON CAPITAL GROUNDS;
OTHER SUCH TRIES MIGHT BE MORE DANGEROS; PARTIES THAT RELATE TO
EXPANDING THE MATTER USING LIGHT
PLEASE MAKE CALLS TO SCIENCE COMMITTEE IN OUR SENATE AND HOUSE; IN
CASE THEY UNDERSTAND
THE LANGUAGE OF COTION; IF THEY DO NOT - WE HAVE TO FAST DEVELO MUTUAL
LANGUAGE AS THIS IS
 POTENTIALLY DANGEROS.)

IT IS SAFE TO SAY THAT OPTICAL AND VUSUAL ASPECTS OF PROCESS INTERCAT
WITH EACH OTHER.