Jimmy Walles, This inquiery if you are willing to step down as
Wikipedia "owner" is for you.



                    " Assertiveness (section)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search
Page notice  You are not currently logged in. If you save any edits,
your IP address will be recorded publicly in this page's edit history.
If you create an account, you can conceal your IP address and be
provided with many other benefits. Messages sent to your IP can be
viewed on your talk page.
Please do not save test edits. If you want to experiment, please use
the sandbox.


Anti-spam check. Do NOT fill this in!

                 == Techniques=="     (THEY MEAN ASSERTIVENESS HERE)
Me:
ESPECIALLY FOR THE OWNER OF WIKIPEDIA

 THE REFERENCE FOR THIS TOPIC OF TECHNIQUES IS TOO OLD; THE TECHNIQUES
DESCRIBED ARE INAPPROPRIATE; AS THE 'OWNER' HAS NO CAPACITY TO
CONTRACT APPROPRIATE EDIT THE TEXT,THAN PLEASE, 'OWNER. STATE THAT YOU
ARE NOT THE ONE, BUT RATHER THAT YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE OFFERED THE SPACE
OF THE SERVER FOR WIKIPEDIA AND THAT YOU DO NOT OWN THE CONTENT.

SPACE ON THE SERVER IS NOT ENOUGH FOR THE OWNERSHIP.

JIMMY WALES ( assuming that the ad presents correct name), PLEASE
DECIDE FASTER
IF YOU ARE OR NOT THE OWNER AS THESE ARE LEGAL ISSUES - PEOPLE,
PROFESSIONS, INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN HISTORY IS NOT ONLY DISTORTED THE
WAY YOU PUT OUT, BUT ALL THESE CAN BE USED AS A SOCIAL WEAPONERY
AGAINST THE OTHER HUMAN BEING. ADJUSTED ASERTIVE PERSON DOES NOT USE
THESE.

I DID NOT LIST THE SCIENCE HERE, AS THE WIKIPEDIA CAN NOT POSSIBLY BE
THE SCEINTIFIC ENCYCLOPEDIA UPON PRESENT EDITING POLICY OFF YOURS.
SOME SCIENTISTS OR MORD TEHSE WHO ARE NOT BUT WANT TO FAST PROMOTE
SOME IDEAS TO PASS AS SCIENTIST GET ON HERE AND PRESENT AS IF
SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT SCIENEC SOURCE AND MOST LIKELY
NEVER WILL BE.
POTENTILALY THE COVERED SCEINCE EXCHANGE MIGHT BE SUCH. IT PRSESUMES
LIABILITY FOR THE OUITCOMES, OBJECTIVITY OF THE SEARCH PROCESS AND
CORRECT CONCLUSION - NO SUCH THING IS POSSIBLE
HERE. SCOPE OF SIGNELLED SCIENEC QUESTION MIGHT BE SOMEWHAT BENEFICIAL
FOR PERSONS OUTSIDE OF THE SCIENEC COMMUNITY; BUT NOT THE ANSWERS.

Jimmy, once , you are not the owner, than the community will develop
more and more inner policies to handle the distortion, fog and
manipulation at Wikipedia. If you are the owner, all that gets even
more compounded. But to me yiu are not the owner, not yet, if you have
such chance.
When the ownership be relayed to all that write in the encyclopedia
and also endorse it, the
credibility level of the publisher information will rise fast.

Issue above needs the attention; If you cannnot edit problem, you not
the owner.

SUGGESTED IS THAT THE INTERNET HAS THE SMALL , AN D NOT ELABORATED
PLACES FOR REGISTRATION OF THE PEOPLE THAT LEGITIMIZE THEIR PRESENCE
IN THE INTERNET PUBLICATION WITH THE STATEMENT OF CRTEDENTIALS  WHY
THEY ARE PUBLISHING; THIS CALLING ON THE PEOPLE TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM
AS ABOVE BECOMES EASIER; BULLIES BE CONFRONTED AND NOT USE MULTIPLE
IMPERSONATIONS OR OMPERSONATIOSN OF OTHER PERSONS.

WIKIPEDIA WOUDL MIST LIKELY BENEFIT FROM THE RRETIRED TEACHERS,
EDITORS, JOURNALIST VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATON, AND WOULD NEED CRIDIT FOR
THEIR OR OTHER INTERVENTION ( BY THE WAY LICENSCED INTERNET COMPANIES
DO ENDORSE THEIR INTERVENTIONS). IF PAID ASSOCIATIONS BE BETETR FOR
THAT PURPOSE, SEEMS TO BE OPEN QUESTION. LOTS AGAINST THAT.

WE ALSO NEED TO WATCH NOT TO MAKE ANOTHER FACEBOOK THAT WAY.

I CAN EDIT THE ENTRY BUT FEEL POWERLESS IN FACE OF MANIPULATION, HERE
PERSHAPS BY INTELLIGENCE TORTURERS ( I am their victim, they all do
use these techniq
es but not face to face but on the satellite based attacks)  OR ARMY
UNDERCOVERED.
THE DEFINITIONS OF WHAT ASSERTIVE IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE. IT IS ALSO
ACCESSIBLE IN OPEN INTERNET OUTSIDE OF WIKIPEDIA.

Wikipedia continues: "Techniques of assertiveness can vary widely.
Manuel Smith, in his 1975 book ''When I Say No, I Feel Guilty'',
offered some of the following behaviors:

HALLO THERE - I DO NOT FEEL GUILTY IN THIS CONTEXT;

====Broken record====
The "broken record" technique<ref name=smith>Smith, M. J. When I say
no, I feel guilty 1975</ref> consists of simply repeating your
requests or your refusals every time you are met with resistance. The
term comes from [[vinyl record]]s, the surface of which when scratched
would lead the needle of a [[record player]] to loop over the same few
seconds of the recording indefinitely. "As with a broken record, the
key to this approach is repetition ... where your partner will not
take no for an answer"<ref>Rich Pfeiffer, ''Relationships:
Assertiveness Skills'' (2010) p. 28</ref>

A disadvantage with this technique is that when resistance continues,
your requests may lose power every time you have to repeat them. If
the requests are repeated too often it can backfire on the authority
of your words. In these cases it is necessary to have some sanctions
on hand.

====Fogging====
Fogging<ref name=smith /> consists of finding some limited truth to
agree with in what an antagonist is saying. More specifically, one can
''agree in part'' or ''agree in principle''.

====Negative inquiry====
Negative inquiry<ref name=smith /> consists of requesting further,
more specific criticism.

====Negative assertion====
Negative assertion<ref name=smith /> is agreement with criticism
without letting up demand.

====I statements====
[[I statement]]s can be used to voice one's feelings and wishes from a
personal position without expressing a judgment about the other person
or blaming one's feelings on them.

THIS ONE IN FACE OF PREDATOR FARTHER DETERIORATES THE VICTIM POSITION.
FAVORATE OF CIA NEVER TRANSPARENT COMMUNICATIONS.


Wikipedia: "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted.
Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. You irrevocably agree to
release your contributions under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the
GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution
under the Creative Commons license. See the Terms of Use for details.
"

Edit summary (Briefly describe the changes you have made)
   Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)
...

USUALLY, OWNING SOMETHING, INCLUDING THE INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE
INTERNET DRAFT OR PUBLICATION INCREASES THE RELIABILITY OF INFORMATION
AND QUALITY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PRODUCT.

IN NO WAY JIMMY OWNS THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INVESTED IN WIKIPEDIA
 - HE DID NOT MAKE IT, HE DID NOT PAY FOR IT-  REGARDLESS OF THE LEVEL
OF RELAIBILITY OF INFORMATION; QUESTION STILL BEING IF HIS PRESENCE AS
THE 'OWNER' SYMBOLIC, DOES NOT LOWER IT.