Data: 2009-04-25 09:57:58 | |
Autor: Me | |
KONTRA-REWOLUCJA: faszystowskie smieci w EPSCO | |
Title: A PERFECT WORLD AT ANY PRICE. By: Wilson, David Sloan, New
Scientist, 02624079, 12/3/2005, Vol. 188, Issue 2528 Database: Science Reference CenterHTML Full TextA PERFECT WORLD AT ANY PRICE Section: Review There's nothing wrong with wanting to change society, says David Sloan Wilson. It's how you go about it that matters World as Laboratory: Experiments with mice, mazes and men by Rebecca Lemov, Hill and Wang, $30, 0809074648 • IMPROVING society by the practical application of scientific knowledge is a laudable goal. So why does calling it social engineering have such an ominous ring? A straw poll among my friends yields associations such as Hitler, eugenics, mind control and Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Social engineering's bad name is based on more than dictators and dark visions of the future, however. SEE TE MANIPULATION : SOCIAL ENGINEERING MIXES WITH BIO-ENGINEERING ( that together with nano technology develops the fastes t right now, every day, every hour, every sec - students at Princeton find it too now) As historian and anthropologist Rebecca Lemov shows in World as Laboratory, it is firmly rooted in the development of the social sciences in the US during the first half of the 20th century. Her book tells this story through the careers of some of the most prominent social scientists of their day. In retrospect, the striking thing about them was their grandiose expectations, as if a full understanding and control of humans and nature were just around the corner. Take Jacques Loeb, a biologist who provided the model for the scientist-hero of Sinclair Lewis's 1925 novel Arrowsmith. He told a reporter, "I wanted to take life in my hands and play with it — to start it, stop it, vary it, study it under every condition." Lemov shows these grandiose expectations were combined with a blind faith in authority, as if scientists, politicians and the captains of industry could be expected to do what was right without any oversight. But what appears most shocking to us today is how these expectations and the trust in authority were combined with a willingness to inflict suffering on individuals in an attempt to benefit society as a whole. The worst excesses took place during the second world war and the Korean war under the guise of national security. LOOK AT THIS ONE- TO ARTIFICAILLY LINK TAHT SADISTS SCEINEC IS ALL SCIENCE; STINKS BYUSHLAND NAIVE FASCISM. Harold George Wolff, the leading authority on pain who conducted covert research on mind control funded by the CIA, boasted that he could provide the keys to "how a man can be made to think, feel, and behave according to the wishes of others, and, conversely, how a man can avoid being influenced in this manner." Some of the experiments conducted during the Korean war by leading scientific authorities are as ghoulish as anything that can be imagined in fiction or the dark recesses of a totalitarian state. They included ice-pick lobotomies that left no scar and the total breakdown of a person prior to "reconstruction". THSI SI FASCISM NOT A SCIENCE.INTERESTING TAHT BUSHLAND ACCUSES SCEINCE OF THSI INIRTIATIVE - TAHT IS HOW TEHY NEVER ASSUME RESPONSIBILITYT AND ARE CURRENTLY DANGEROUS TO OUR CIVILIZATION, PERHAPS WORLD WIDE. Most social scientists were unaware of these experiments but were willing to receive military funding for their own research. MOST SOCIAL SCIENTIS ARE MILITARY SCIENTISTS, ACCORDING TO THSI SCAM HERE. As one CIA scientist put it during a 1977 congressional hearing: "Don't get the idea that all these behavioural scientists were nice and pure, that they didn't want to change anything and that they were detached in their science. They were up to their necks in changing people. It just happened that the things they were interested in were not always the same as what we were." DIBUND ALL ARMY SOCIAL SCIENEC NOW Lemov's gallery of social scientists concludes with Timothy Leary, who had rather different ideas about how to alter human behaviour. MORONS DO NOT TELL SCIENCE SUBJECT FROM SUBJECT As a young and soon-to-be-fired Harvard professor in 1961, he obtained permission to take LSD with inmates of a local prison in an attempt to break down the barrier between scientist and subject. Leary recalls that his first trip with a Polish embezzler named John got off to a rocky start. "'Doc,' he said, 'why are you afraid of me?' WHAT PLISH HAS TO DO WITH THE MESSAGE IN TEH SAMPLE OTHER THAN THE BUSHLAND FRAMING POLAND SINCE THEY OFTEN USED POLAND IN POLAND AND SPEAK POLISH OR SOME POLISH. I said, 'I'm afraid of you, John, because you're a criminal.' He nodded. I said, 'John, why are you afraid of me?' He said, 'I'm afraid of you, Doc, because you're a mad scientist.' Then our retinas locked and I slid down into the tunnel of his eyes, and I could feel him walking around in my skull and we both began to laugh. "And there it was, that dark moment of fear and mistrust, which could have changed in a second to hatred and terror. But we made the love connection. The flicker in the dark. Suddenly, the sun came out in the room and I felt great and I knew he did too." Leary's treatment had a profound effect on the prisoners, but only for as long as their relationship lasted. WHAT IS THIS NONSENSE - CAOUNSELLING INMATES, WHICHEVER WAY IS NOT A SCIENCE PROJECT. TEHSE IDIOTS ARE EVERYWHERE NOW - PLEASE CHECK WJHATB THEY MEAN UNDER EVERY WORLD. Nevertheless, his experiment hints at the missing ingredient that can restore social engineering's good name — mutual trust. People dread being controlled by others without their consent, for the best of reasons. "When people agree on their social priorities by consensus, then the practical application of scientific knowledge becomes benign". TOTAL FASCIST LIE. IN UISA ALL SCIENEC WITHOUT CONZSET IS UNETHICAL - TEHSE MORONS DO NOT EVEN HAVE ANY DEGREE AND SLIP THROUGHT CRACKS AS CIA CRIMINALS BNEVER CHARGED. Peopel waste time , me inluded here) reading thgsi garbage. Perhaps social engineering will salvage its good name if we can build bonds of mutual trust more durable than a drug-induced state. PERHAPS REPORT YOURSELF TO ERIC HOLDER AND THE SENATE TAHT GAVE YOU GRAND. "Don't get the idea these people were all nice and pure" PHOTO (COLOR): Fritz Lang's Metropolis helped give social engineering a bad name ~~~~~~~~ By David Sloan Wilson David Sloan Wilson is an evolutionary biologist at Binghamton University, New York ........... DID YOU SEE HOW MAIN TOPIC IS ANTY SCIENCE BUT "PLEASE RESTORE US THE SOCAIL ENGINEERS ( FASCISTS THAT IS - ALL ILLS SO FAT BY SCIENCE, WE EXCEPTIONAL AMERICA)" THESE BUSHLAND MORONS ARE SO SIMPLISTIC, PEOPEL HERE IGNORE THIS; BUT THEY GET DANGEROUS IF WE DO AS THE SANATORS GIVING GRANDS ARE EITHER MOTIVATED FOR FASCISM AND NEPOPTISM OR CAN NOT GET THE MANIPULATION |
|