1. CIA RECOMMENDATION AND EVEN WORSE - ACTIVE FINANCIAL SUPPORT IN THE
STATES- IS A QUALIFIER FOR THE PRESIDENT ( while only disqualifier -
security boundary crossings; fixing under table and the worse yet form
of criminalized conflict of interests - as the parties know at the
entry that they enter conflict and do not have to find self paying
both sides simultaneously and worse firing at each sides of own
people , wanna call it collateral and damage;  that disturbs
representative function of the people representatives , power of the
executive in the future).

 Opposite is true the CIA business that is with the international
safety o the country is reportable to the executive not executive to
pulled on the string of the underground of which people of the USA do
not even know, thus can not control via elections and after. Solution-
CIA has no business to mix with candidate in any way; these who do
promise CIA drones against the political oppositions are not only not
democratic - they are mobs in the fascist style.

Yesterday powerful satellites were drowned into the entrance of the
Labor  Department Trenton ( who can not guess which candidate entered
such transaction?). Is the Department safe - this candidate is from
the other state , in case it goes back; if goes forward = many more
drones even against own people ready.




2. THIS ONE MIGHT JUST BE A SYMPTOM
"Now, however, a rift with one of its founding members — the
billionaire conservative Charles Koch — is threatening the institute’s
identity and independence, its leaders say, and is exposing fault
lines over Mr. Koch’s aggressive and well-financed brand of Republican
politics. "
UNLESS THIS IS ONLY MARKET PLAY. HOW DO WE KNOW WHICH? LEFTIES WANNA
FREE MARKETS BE THEIRS ( if so - lets go)