IS THIS NEW EVIDENCE IN KIDNAPPING THE POLISH GOVERMENT IN APRIL
2010?



Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Washington DCMoscowBeijingBeirutBrusselsPrintCancel

Proliferation Analysis
Debating NATO's Nuclear Policy
Proliferation Analysis, April 29, 2010

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Editor's Note: On April 22-23, the foreign ministers from NATO's 28
member states gathered in Tallinn, Estonia, for a two-day meeting. In
the first article, Oliver Schmidt, based in Germany, reflects on the
NATO talks and the utility of maintaining U.S. nuclear weapons in
Europe. In the second article, Lukasz Kulesa, from Poland, discusses
how the Obama administration's Nuclear Posture Review might affect
NATO's nuclear policy.

The Utility of U.S. Tactical Nuclear Weapons in NATO: A European
Perspective
By Oliver Schmidt

During the recent meeting of NATO's foreign ministers and secretaries
of state in Tallinn, Estonia, it became increasingly clear that there
is disagreement over the fundamental purpose of NATO and the utility
of maintaining its tactical nuclear weapons. The debate encompassed
three main views. First, NATO should remain a regional military
alliance that focuses on the territorial integrity of its member
states. Second, NATO is primarily a regional military alliance, but
should also be used for humanitarian intervention if its member states
decide to do so. Third, NATO is more than a regional military
alliance; it represents "Western" values and should therefore expand
its membership and geographical focus to include like-minded states
worldwide.

What these three positions reveal is that NATO does not have a common
understanding of risks and threats. While the countries of central and
Eastern Europe still fear the perceived threat of Russia, the
countries of Western and Southern Europe are more focused on new
security challenges stemming mainly from non-state actors.

The result of this security divide is the current controversy over the
nearly 200 remaining U.S. tactical nuclear weapons stationed in
Belgium, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, and Germany. Eastern European
countries like Poland view these weapons as a sign that the United
States is taking the mutual defense clause enshrined in Article 5 of
NATO's charter seriously. As a U.S. ally, and perhaps given Iran's
nuclear ambitions, Turkey is also very cautious about the possible
withdrawal of U.S. nuclear weapons from its soil. More fundamental is
the concern in Europe over the obvious imbalance between NATO's 200
tactical nuclear weapons and Russia’s estimated 3,000 non-strategic
weapons.

So what should be the way ahead? Germany’s current position is to lead
efforts for the removal of tactical nuclear weapons from Europe. This
was formulated in the November 2009 agreement that brought Germany's
ruling parties into coalition, which came as a surprise for many NATO
countries. The German coalition agreement was, in fact, an attempt to
gain popular domestic support by advancing a nuclear disarmament
agenda. In Germany, as in many other European countries, the majority
of the population favors the withdrawal. But Germany could have simply
resolved the issue over time. The only German weapons system capable
of delivering nuclear weapons is the Tornado strike fighter, which
will be phased out by 2030 at the latest. The new multi-role Euro
Fighter, which will replace the Tornado, is not currently designed to
deliver tactical nuclear weapons. For many Germans, then, the question
is, given the maximum range of these strike fighters, what could they
possibly hit that is not a NATO or European country?

By February 2010 the Netherlands, Norway, Belgium, and Luxembourg
joined Germany's proposal for the withdrawal of nuclear weapons and
debated the issue at the NATO meeting in Tallinn. However, U.S.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has stated clearly that there will
be no withdrawal without an agreement with Russia about their tactical
nuclear arsenal in Europe. In order to reach an agreement, it would be
a helpful and necessary step to resolve the critical status of the
Treaty on the Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE). Russia postponed
its treaty commitments after NATO member countries did not ratify the
adapted CFE Treaty, which addresses the significant changes in
Europe's military balance after the collapse of the Warsaw Pact. The
NATO countries, on the other hand, demand the withdrawal of Russian
troops from Georgia and Moldova in accordance with the 1999 Istanbul
commitments before they ratify the adapted CFE.

Russia will rely on nuclear weapons to compensate for the imbalance as
long as it perceives a conventional superiority of NATO forces in
Europe. Only when this Russian perception is assuaged will it be
possible to find a solution regarding the status of tactical nuclear
weapons in Europe. What remains is the need for providing reliable
U.S. and NATO commitments to collective defense, especially to Poland
and Turkey. Dealing with these threat perceptions will require finding
ways to develop a security architecture that can deter today's threats
without anachronistic nuclear thinking.

Oliver Schmidt works for the German Council on Foreign Relations
(DGAP) in Berlin, Germany's oldest non-partisan, non-governmental
think tank.
....

Who provoked this way 2 weeks after kidnapping the Polish Goverment?

Why Riga?Roma Locuta, Causa Finita? The Nuclear Posture Review and the
Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe
By Lukasz Kulesa

Last week, the foreign ministers of NATO’s 28 member states gathered
in Estonia for informal talks. There was one especially controversial
issue on the agenda: the future of NATO’s nuclear policy. Included in
the discussions was the question of whether NATO should continue to
rely on the approximately 200 U.S. B-61 nuclear bombs stored in Europe
as part of U.S. extended deterrence.

The message of the meeting does not herald any far-reaching change.
The problem will be further discussed until a consensus is found
within NATO. In theory, all options are still on the table. But in
practice, a compromise seems to be in the making at NATO-- one which
would seriously disappoint the proponents of an early withdrawal, but
is the only solution which would prove acceptable to all of NATO’s
member states.

The position of the United States is crucial to chart NATO’s course on
this issue. The recently released U.S. Nuclear Posture Review (NPR)
offers a number of hints on how Washington might influence the
alliance’s nuclear strategy towards a gradual change rather than a
revolution.'


KTO TO JEST TEN RADCA PRAWNY, KTORY TAK SIE ZACHOWUJE W CZASIE
ZALOBY W POSLCE. CZYIM RADCA ON JEST?

'Łukasz KuleszaAbsolwent Wydziału Prawa na Uniwersytecie w
Białymstoku. Od 2007 r. aplikant radcowski w Okręgowej Izbie Radców
Prawnych w Kielcach.

Łukasz Kulesza specjalizuje się w prawie cywilnym, gospodarczym oraz
handlowym. Zajmuje się obsługą spółek kapitałowych, prawem zobowiązań,
transakcjami handlowymi, prawem upadłościowym,  oraz zagadnieniami
administracyjnymi w obszarze ochrony przyrody i ochrony środowiska.
Uczestniczy w procesach sądowych z zakresu prawa cywilnego, w
szczególności gospodarczego oraz postępowaniach administracyjnych i
sądowo-administracyjnych.

Z Kancelarią związany od 2008 r. Operuje językiem angielskim..

W toku prowadzonej praktyki kieruje się mottem: Neminem laedit, qui
suo iure utitur (Nikogo nie krzywdzi, ten kto korzysta ze swego
prawa).

AND , MIND YOU THAT IS ART NOVUEAU ( 'MLODA POLSKA POST
ROMATYCYSTYCZNY TREND OMIJANY BARDZO SKRZERTNIE PRZEZ FOGGY CITY, THAT
PHONIES SELF IN )

TEN LUKASZ JEST BARDZO UPARTYM LACINOZNAWCA TERAZ. MUSIMY SZUKAV
DALEJ: JAK:
 NAJPIERW JAK UCIEKLA 'NOWA  POLSKA' Z POLSKI .

The style was influenced strongly by Czech artist Alphonse Mucha, when
Mucha produced a lithographed poster, which appeared on 1 January 1895
in the streets of Paris as an advertisement for the play Gismonda by
Victorien Sardou, featuring Sarah Bernhardt.[6] It popularized the new
artistic style and its creator to the citizens of Paris. Initially
named Style Mucha, (Mucha Style), his style soon became known as Art
Nouveau.[7]

Art Nouveau was most popular in Europe and the British Islands, but
its influence was global.
AHA! NAPRAWDE? MY JEDNAK ZAGLADALISMY DO LONDYNU? GDZIE TAM SA JAKIES
REGUISITY?
Hence, it is known in various guises with frequent localised
tendencies.[8] In France, Hector Guimard's Paris metro entrances were
of art nouveau style and Emile GallĂŠ practiced the style in Nancy.
Victor Horta had a decisive effect on architecture in Belgium.[9]
Magazines like Jugend helped publicize the style in Germany,
especially as a graphic artform, while the Vienna Secessionists
influenced art and architecture throughout Austria-Hungary. Art
Nouveau was also a style of distinct individuals such as Gustav Klimt,
Charles Rennie Mackintosh, Alphonse Mucha, RenĂŠ Lalique, Antoni GaudĂ­
and Louis Comfort Tiffany, each of whom interpreted it in their own
manner.[10][11]"

NIE MA I JUZ.

NARESZCIE 'PHON' AND  ' LAND OF CROWD OF THE ST. STEPHEN.' AND THERE
IS AUSTRALIAN POLAND 9 REMEMBER AROUDN TEH YEAR OF AMERICAN
CONSTITUTION AUSTRIA AHS CLAIMED PART OF POLAND TO APPARENTLY STILL
RETURMN PART AND PART KEEP WITHOUT A GOOD REASON - THERE WAS THE BIRTH
OF THIS ARTISTIC CONVENTION.

Name in official languages of Austria-HungaryNames of the Dual
Monarchy in officially recognized languages of its citizens:

Croatian: Austro-Ugarska
Czech: Rakousko-Uhersko
German: Österreich-Ungarn
Hungarian: Ausztria-MagyarorszĂĄg
Italian: Austria-Ungheria
Polish: Austro-Węgry -                                        EURECA!
Romanian: Austro-Ungaria
Serbian: Aустро-Угарска/Austro-Ugarska
Slovak: RakĂşsko-Uhorsko
Slovene: Avstro-Ogrska
Turkish: Avusturya-Macaristan
Ukrainian: Австро-Угорщина (transliterated: Avstro-Uhorshchina)


WCIAZ - DLACZEGO KULESZA ( LUKASZ ONLY) MOWI PO LACINIE

POLSKA MIALA WPLYWE W REJONEI RYSKIM PRZEZ 3 POLSKIE WOJEWODZTWA TAM
JAKO CZESC HOLLY ROMAN EMPIRE LUB PRZECIWNIE ( W ZALEZNOSCI KTIORY
POPRZADEOK SWIATA OBOWIAZUJE).

W 2 TYG PO NAPADZIE NA POLAKOW, RADCA PRAWNY NIE PAMIETA JUZ NIC O
POLSKIM INTERESIE W REJONIE; O POROZUMIENIACH RYSKICH I O POLAKACH
ZABITYCH W REJONIE WTEDY I  TEARZ ( JESLI IM TERAZ
WIERZYC).POROZUMIENIA RYSKIE ZOSTALY WPROWADZONE W ZYCIE, ALE REJON
RYSKI ZOSTAL SEPAROWANY I ZOSTAL POSKIM WYJATKIEM TAM - STAD BUSH
WPROWADZA NATO ALE NIE WCZESNIEJ NIZ PO PORWANIU POLSKIEGO RZADU,
KTORY ZAZADAL WIZUALNEJ INSPEKCJI TERENU FOR THE REASONS GIVEN NOW BY
TGHE NEW PECE FOUNDATION - THERE WAS NO INFORMATION SUFFICUENTLY
EXPLAING THE SITUATION IN THE REGION ( THERE SI MORE INFORMATION ABOUT
IT TOO)

LEGALLY SPEAKING, THIS IS ' FRESH EVIDENCE.'


.....

CAN COMBINATION OF THESE FACTS BE ACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE OF
BRITISH MOTIVE FOR KIDNAPING OF POLISH GOVERMENT MANIFESTED IN THESE
SEEKINGB THE PHONY INFLUENCE OF THE ROAD  ( THAT  WAS ENGLISCH CHANNEL
THAT THEY HAD AND NOT 'THE CORRIDOR' - POSLKI KORYTARZA NADBALTYCKI)
AND OF THE MAP ( LIKE THAT STYPHEN PHONY CROWN - THE INDIVIDUAL THAT
PLAYS 'STYPHEN STEFAN BE IN POLISH STEPHEN IN PHILADELPHIA - AS
CHURCH-' READY TO DECOMPOSE THAN POLAND IN AUSTRIA, HAS DONE THAT
ELSWHERE VIA PHONY FANTACIES OF PHONY CROWN; WHAT THIS ONE JOKER IS? I
AM GATHERING FAST THAT HE IS ALIVE AND HAVE A CLUE).