"Divide to concur" ( or get concur-ed) in American
political life
                  on the subject evolution v creationism.

NYT: "Mr. Perry and Mrs. Bachmann dismiss evolution as an unproven
theory. "

If THAT IS TRUE ( CAN NOT FOLLOW VERY WELL AS I AM CONSTANTLY THROWN
OF LINE, NO VIDEO TAPE IN THE LIBRARY INTERNET WORKS FOR ME EVEN IF I
GET IT ON LINE; PAPERS ARE NOT AVAILABLE IN THE 'ESTABLISHMENT" I AM
IN EVEN THOUGH THERE IS THE LAW IN THIS MATTER IN THE USA AND EVEN
PRISONERS HAVE TO HAVE DAILY NEWSPAPER AVAILED; THE TV THAT IS
SOMETIMES TURNED ON OR ON THE DISCRETION OF OFFENDING STAFF IS RARELY
ON THE POLITICAL NEWS BUT MUCH RATHER ON THE SITCOM) THAN
AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE REPRESENTATIVES THAT ARE NOT ONLY NOT EDUCATED
BUT NOT WILLING TO CHECK CURRENT NEWS.

I SAY, 'IF', TRUE, DUE TO THAT BLOCKADE OF INFORMATION THAT IS STILL
POSSIBLE EVEN ON ME, A PERSON THAT IS POLITICALLY INVOLVED AND KNOWS
WHERE TO CHECK THE NEWS.

BUT THAN I CAN RUN WITH IT AS UNCHECKED YESTERDAY, DISTORTED NEWS
BECAUSE THE FELLOW AMERICANS HAVE THESE THINGS ON THE BANNERS WHETHER
CHECKED OR UNCHECKED FOR THE SAKE OF POLITICAL DIVISIVENESS WHILE THE
ISSUE OF EVOLUTION VERSUS CREATIONISM IS ATTENDED ENOUGH AND HAS
FORMED INFORMED OPINION.

 FOR ME IT IS MORE THAN THE OPINION, BUT LET STAY WITH THE INFORMED
OPINION - THAT ONE IS GOOD  ENOUGH FOR AMERICA.

IT IS IN THIS TOPIC THAT BOTH WAYS OF LIFE DEVELOPMENT ON EARTH ARE
TRUE.
( come in to see life forming while you watch on the Delaware River in
Morrisville or nearby River Line train line - this one be by creation
in the nano field, but not in any way contradicted by understanding
the evolutionary tree ( although that one has the stock points - these
get resolved by observation of life, itself,  fast). All the current
publications, museum of evolution that appears and disappears ( in
London), catholic publications ( sic!) all are  of such opinion.