Data: 2009-11-18 14:19:29 | |
Autor: Me | |
New: HOW TO "PATENT" THE LIE AT NYT. | |
This was to be about quantum compouters. BY THE WAY - IT IS NOT READY! B7USHLAND LIES LIES AND LKIES ABOUT NEW DEVICES, ALWAYS WHILE NOT IN CAPACITY TO EVN MAKE THEM THEMSELVES. THIS CREATES INCTREDIBLE LOSS OF ETHIC, LOS OF TIME AND NONSENSES LIKE BELOW - THE BIGGEST WORRY NOW IS TOI GIVE OUT OLD DEVOICE, ACCORDING TO BUSHLAND, THE LAND OF THE "PATTENTED" LIE NYT : "Despite the obvious advantages, sharing patents isn’t as easy as it might sound. “Numerous features of the intellectual property system, particularly the ability of companies to claim large swaths of technology through patents, play havoc with collaborative efforts,” says Josh Lerner, a professor at Harvard Business School. Henry Chesbrough, the executive director of the Center for Open Innovation at the University of California, Berkeley, says it is surprisingly hard to give away technologies. “If it is not done carefully,” he said, “the companies that use a donated technology might find themselves liable for infringement of another company’s patent.” Both the Eco-Patent Commons and the Green Xchange pose organizational challenges for participating companies. “Deciding which patents to pledge or license to a commons,” says Andrew King, a professor at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, “requires that the legal counsel, R.& D. staff, business unit and corporate sustainability groups all work together, and most organizations just aren’t set up for that.” Weaving corporate togetherness, it seems, isn’t so easy — though green innovations offer many more reasons to try. Mary Tripsas is an associate professor in the entrepreneurial management unit at the Harvard Business School." |
|