Data: 2010-01-22 10:23:31 | |
Autor: Me | |
" Obama science revolution" | |
ESSEY ON NECESSITY OF SCIENCE REVOLUTION
President, after the triauphant taking over science organziations in USA, however selected, and mostly all tarantulas of the world, several books on his socail revolution, he does not lead the SCIENCE REVOLUTION. Was he to do it in the first place?.By his own standard, yes. There are no good news there. President succumbs from one restrictions to the other not just in the banking industry. Pathetic it is one contradiction in terms after contradiction. President seem unyeilding and completely dishonest in contacts with me about the work of FIVU and other issues. President refused to pay small cost related bill for the infirmation that he has received, stagnating operation of FIVU. He has refused to finance the FIVU completely but cost of own process of getting information is his. Unyielding! We do hold substancial new science that he wants to apply, but acts opposite to it. What he wants most is to deny the credits and steal the effects. Such approach is not getting excepted from the social process and if nobody else holds President accountable for the development of supopresion and actual spear of science Revolution but undegroug from the President will is occuring. This one place President no matter how hard he tries can nort except self. Excepting in any case if not the collosal size, is one or more down not up. Sorry. By now, we all have a problem with his highest ever stategies. "German BdB Banks Association Slams Obama Plans Wall Street Journal - Ulrike Dauer, Vladimir Guevarra - â FRANKFURT (Dow Jones)-- Germany's BdB banking association Friday slammed US President Barack Obama's proposals to limit US banking activities, saying they could hamper the performance of banks and the economy". PRESIDENT ALSO MIXED THE MEANING OF SCIENCE REVOLUTION WITH PRESIDENTIAL POLITICAL REVOLUTION, A CLEAR CONTRADICTION AGAIN - TAHT REVOLUTION HE CAN DO ONLY AGAINST SELF. OVERLY INCLUSIVE APPROACH AND LACK OF ANY OPRECISION IN THOUGHT. Science Revolution is teh fact by the vertue of existance of counter- revolution and the supresion of thought. ( in case of President he woudl have to slip to two and do own supression - I hope we stop him right there for lack of any sincerity). (nhackers are halting editing the letter - send before more masacre from them) Science revolution is a hard labous against the conter-revolution and the supression of information. Some of it occurred as a result of political supresion and some by the fact that people in science were splitting the subject matter too far; I do not cont indolents in this context. Suppresion clearly occured in 60 ties; but self - limiting aspects of science operation occured in differet centers and in the trends of science thought, like reducing nearly all to linear relationships, neglecting and not even fully defining process aspect of knowledge development ( so called now rhealm of peocess is still at the philosophical dispute and writings are desintegrated), overvaluing formal systems only beacuse it is so difficult to put together teh comprehensive model that is not reductionistic;forgeting all together that using the reductionistic models means fragmentation. Thank to wake up call from non-sciences that take all reality even as a physical process, we are stop to think fifst before any next sensible intervention let say in the ecological environ. Invoked that way transition to higher organization of science is beneficial in may ways - while we garsp the full of nano- world , we grasp the rest as well. There is no more way of comntradicting self ala President in trying to eliminate from our lives next ( one in 90 milions ) chemicals, without identifying it first thus contradicting self ( Hallo Senator Schumer, it must not be working for this reasonspelled here! It is not plastic or any element in it, it is a broader invoked instability of processes taht is a problem now. Plastic in this context in malevolent or even beneficial like that plastic stracture outside of USA Capital - along with natural superconductors it the best there is bouncer of the strained physical systems, while it is true that we do not need even one more new artificial supeconductor (a form of sophisticated filter that is/was/; but only when you ready, assuming that legislative power does account for the representativeness of the matters that it guides). |
|