Data: 2009-03-11 14:20:47 | |
Autor: Me | |
Proba wylapania lobuzow, bardzo slaba | |
agnescherry@gmail.com | My Groups | Favorites | Profile | Help | My Account | Sign out soc.culture.europe Discussions + new post About this group Subscribe to this group This is a Usenet group - learn more The Navy Command Center was the Target of the Attack Options There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic. There was an error processing your request. Please try again. Standard view View as tree Proportional text Fixed text 1 message - Collapse all - Translate all to Translated (View all originals) The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet. Your reply message has not been sent. Your post was successful Cancel Send Discard From: To: Cc: Followup To: Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject Subject: Validation: For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Send Discard False Flag Terrorism View profile Translated (View Original) More options Mar 11, 3:14 pm Newsgroups: soc.culture.turkish, talk.politics.european-union, soc.culture.europe, soc.culture.spain, soc.culture.swiss From: False Flag Terrorism <911_Terror_C...@noemail.net> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:14:42 GMT Local: Wed, Mar 11 2009 3:14 pm Subject: The Navy Command Center was the Target of the Attack Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author The Navy Command Center was the Target of the Attack “The US Authorities have tried to make believe that the damage caused to the Pentagon, on September 11, 2001 was caused by the crash of a hijacked Boeing airliner on the building. This lie was meant to hide the fact that a bombing attack was in fact carried out by a group of people who had authorized access to the Pentagon and that the target was not the Departement of Defense in general but the new Navy Command Center.” — Anymonous Why might someone want to target the Naval Command Center (NCC)? Most people know of the NORAD “all seeing” defensive network, with radar and satellite capabilities. But in their shadow, the NCC also was a very formable command and control facility, with some overlapping capacities. The site of the attack occurred on the first floor at the Naval Command Center portion of the Pentagon. The facility was a powerhouse of information gathering, command and control, and systems for monitoring “all warfare mission areas.” Starting in 1996 the Navy was implementing an upgrade; The Tactical Command System (TCS) upgrades the Navy’s Command Control, Computer and Intelligence (C3I) systems and processes C3I information for all warfare mission areas including planning, direction and reconstruction of missions for peacetime, wartime and times of crises. Included among these C3I systems are: the unified command centers of CINCPAC and CINCLANT, the Navy Command Center…[i] [Emphasis added] The only U.S. Navy Command Center survivor, Lieutenant Kevin Shaeffer, claimed: “Had the Command Center not been destroyed it surely would have been able to provide the highest levels of our Navy leadership with updates as to exactly what was occurring.”[ii] If someone wanted to silence any evidence or witnesses that had privy knowledge of what happened on 9/11 — there were two choices; either they were with the perpetrators and cooperated, or they weren’t and had to be destroyed. This might have made the NCC a prime target if the Navy wasn’t in on the neocon’s Attack on America. However, there is no evidence that the Navy was directly involved. The Office of Naval Intelligence had its offices in the Naval Command Center. A theory proposed by Tom Wilson may have deep roots in the Pentagon, and involves Israeli espionage. The Office of Naval Intelligence may have had incriminating evidence on Israeli espionage. When Pollard’s activities were exposed — he was convicted of spying for Israel from 1984 through 1985. The following individuals were suspected by then-Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger’s office of the general counsel of being co-conspirators: Douglas Feith – worked at the Pentagon from March 1984 to September 1986 as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Negotiations Policy. John Lehman – worked at the Pentagon as the Secretary of the Navy from 1981 to 1987. Richard Perle – worked at the Pentagon as Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy from 1981 to 1987. Paul Wolfowitz – worked at the State Department as Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs from 1982 to 1986. The “spy ring” returns… Pollard obtained classified material from his workplace in Suitland, Maryland, just a few miles from Washington DC. Furthermore, like Pollard — Perle also has passed secrets to Israel. In 1970, Perle was caught by the FBI passing secrets to the Israeli Embassy in Washington DC.[iii] When George W. Bush became President, he appointed these conspirators to high-level Pentagon jobs (makes you wonder, who is Bush’s real master). Feith – was appointed Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. John Lehman – worked on the 9/11 Commission (setup by the Bush Administration). Perle – was appointed Chairman of the Defense Policy Board. Wolfowitz – was appointed Deputy Secretary of Defense. Mike Vreeland of Office of Naval Intelligence, stated that: Certain government officials — politicians, brass, and high ranking military — have 11th Amendment privileges and can’t be sued. Another government agency has to go investigate activities connected to weapons smuggling, organized crime, and drug trafficking. They use their power to break laws, and we’re not allowed to investigate them. Thus certain parts of the U.S. government designed an entity called Unofficial Intelligence Investigation Division (UID). It was designed by Adm. Jeremy Michael Boorda, who allegedly committed suicide. Boorda put this together prior to becoming CNO [Chief of Naval Operations]. He was not a bad guy.25 It appears the Navy was trying to keep “tabs of” illegal spying activities, in an attempt to control it, and some didn’t like that! Were Navy veterans recruited to participate in an exercise on 9/11? Each of the following individuals on Flight 77 had been in the Navy: Charles Burlingame III – pilot, had once worked at the Naval Command Center in the Pentagon. David Charlebois – Copilot, Navy. William Caswell – one of the Navy’s top scientists. Charles Droz III – Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy and Vice President for software development, EM Solutions Inc. Wilson “Bud” Flagg – retired admiral (Involved in “Tailhook”). Bryan Jack – worked for the Office of the Secretary of Defense. [Bryan Jack was involved with economics and budgeting. There was soon to be a massive fraud in the Pentagon, prompting neocon comptroller and Jewish Rabbi Dov Zakheim to quit. Did he know about this? It is possible that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld recruited Mr. Jack to participate in this exercise.] John Sammartino – former worker at Naval Research Lab. John Yamnicky – consultant and ex-test pilot. Vicki Yancey – former naval electronics technician. And while not in the Navy, Barbara Olson – was a devote right-winger and wife of Ted Olson, who was Jonathan Pollard’s former attorney! It is certainly possible that Ted Olson recruited his third wife to participate in this conspiracy. Did Ted Olson want to destroy the incriminating records of his ‘clients’? If the perpetrators were going to attack the World Trade Center towers, then they would have to attack the Navy Command Center as well. Since those inside the NCC were following all the events unfolding on 9/11. |
|
Data: 2009-03-11 23:45:21 | |
Autor: ColgatesBilly | |
Proba wylapania lobuzow, bardzo slaba | |
Can you tell me and Jadrys what here is walking?
KOL -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - "Me" <agnescherry@gmail.com> wrote in message news:deef2c43-56c2-463c-ba6a-8b0aa9514dcda12g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... agnescherry@gmail.com | My Groups | Favorites | Profile | Help | My Account | Sign out soc.culture.europe Discussions + new post About this group Subscribe to this group This is a Usenet group - learn more The Navy Command Center was the Target of the Attack Options There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic. There was an error processing your request. Please try again. Standard view View as tree Proportional text Fixed text 1 message - Collapse all - Translate all to Translated (View all originals) The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet. Your reply message has not been sent. Your post was successful Cancel Send Discard From: To: Cc: Followup To: Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject Subject: Validation: For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Send Discard False Flag Terrorism View profile Translated (View Original) More options Mar 11, 3:14 pm Newsgroups: soc.culture.turkish, talk.politics.european-union, soc.culture.europe, soc.culture.spain, soc.culture.swiss From: False Flag Terrorism <911_Terror_C...@noemail.net> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:14:42 GMT Local: Wed, Mar 11 2009 3:14 pm Subject: The Navy Command Center was the Target of the Attack Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author The Navy Command Center was the Target of the Attack “The US Authorities have tried to make believe that the damage caused to the Pentagon, on September 11, 2001 was caused by the crash of a hijacked Boeing airliner on the building. This lie was meant to hide the fact that a bombing attack was in fact carried out by a group of people who had authorized access to the Pentagon and that the target was not the Departement of Defense in general but the new Navy Command Center.” — Anymonous Why might someone want to target the Naval Command Center (NCC)? Most people know of the NORAD “all seeing” defensive network, with radar and satellite capabilities. But in their shadow, the NCC also was a very formable command and control facility, with some overlapping capacities. The site of the attack occurred on the first floor at the Naval Command Center portion of the Pentagon. The facility was a powerhouse of information gathering, command and control, and systems for monitoring “all warfare mission areas.” Starting in 1996 the Navy was implementing an upgrade; The Tactical Command System (TCS) upgrades the Navy’s Command Control, Computer and Intelligence (C3I) systems and processes C3I information for all warfare mission areas including planning, direction and reconstruction of missions for peacetime, wartime and times of crises. Included among these C3I systems are: the unified command centers of CINCPAC and CINCLANT, the Navy Command Center…[i] [Emphasis added] The only U.S. Navy Command Center survivor, Lieutenant Kevin Shaeffer, claimed: “Had the Command Center not been destroyed it surely would have been able to provide the highest levels of our Navy leadership with updates as to exactly what was occurring.”[ii] If someone wanted to silence any evidence or witnesses that had privy knowledge of what happened on 9/11 — there were two choices; either they were with the perpetrators and cooperated, or they weren’t and had to be destroyed. This might have made the NCC a prime target if the Navy wasn’t in on the neocon’s Attack on America. However, there is no evidence that the Navy was directly involved. The Office of Naval Intelligence had its offices in the Naval Command Center. A theory proposed by Tom Wilson may have deep roots in the Pentagon, and involves Israeli espionage. The Office of Naval Intelligence may have had incriminating evidence on Israeli espionage. When Pollard’s activities were exposed — he was convicted of spying for Israel from 1984 through 1985. The following individuals were suspected by then-Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger’s office of the general counsel of being co-conspirators: Douglas Feith – worked at the Pentagon from March 1984 to September 1986 as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Negotiations Policy. John Lehman – worked at the Pentagon as the Secretary of the Navy from 1981 to 1987. Richard Perle – worked at the Pentagon as Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy from 1981 to 1987. Paul Wolfowitz – worked at the State Department as Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs from 1982 to 1986. The “spy ring” returns… Pollard obtained classified material from his workplace in Suitland, Maryland, just a few miles from Washington DC. Furthermore, like Pollard — Perle also has passed secrets to Israel. In 1970, Perle was caught by the FBI passing secrets to the Israeli Embassy in Washington DC.[iii] When George W. Bush became President, he appointed these conspirators to high-level Pentagon jobs (makes you wonder, who is Bush’s real master). Feith – was appointed Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. John Lehman – worked on the 9/11 Commission (setup by the Bush Administration). Perle – was appointed Chairman of the Defense Policy Board. Wolfowitz – was appointed Deputy Secretary of Defense. Mike Vreeland of Office of Naval Intelligence, stated that: Certain government officials — politicians, brass, and high ranking military — have 11th Amendment privileges and can’t be sued. Another government agency has to go investigate activities connected to weapons smuggling, organized crime, and drug trafficking. They use their power to break laws, and we’re not allowed to investigate them. Thus certain parts of the U.S. government designed an entity called Unofficial Intelligence Investigation Division (UID). It was designed by Adm. Jeremy Michael Boorda, who allegedly committed suicide. Boorda put this together prior to becoming CNO [Chief of Naval Operations]. He was not a bad guy.25 It appears the Navy was trying to keep “tabs of” illegal spying activities, in an attempt to control it, and some didn’t like that! Were Navy veterans recruited to participate in an exercise on 9/11? Each of the following individuals on Flight 77 had been in the Navy: Charles Burlingame III – pilot, had once worked at the Naval Command Center in the Pentagon. David Charlebois – Copilot, Navy. William Caswell – one of the Navy’s top scientists. Charles Droz III – Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy and Vice President for software development, EM Solutions Inc. Wilson “Bud” Flagg – retired admiral (Involved in “Tailhook”). Bryan Jack – worked for the Office of the Secretary of Defense. [Bryan Jack was involved with economics and budgeting. There was soon to be a massive fraud in the Pentagon, prompting neocon comptroller and Jewish Rabbi Dov Zakheim to quit. Did he know about this? It is possible that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld recruited Mr. Jack to participate in this exercise.] John Sammartino – former worker at Naval Research Lab. John Yamnicky – consultant and ex-test pilot. Vicki Yancey – former naval electronics technician. And while not in the Navy, Barbara Olson – was a devote right-winger and wife of Ted Olson, who was Jonathan Pollard’s former attorney! It is certainly possible that Ted Olson recruited his third wife to participate in this conspiracy. Did Ted Olson want to destroy the incriminating records of his ‘clients’? If the perpetrators were going to attack the World Trade Center towers, then they would have to attack the Navy Command Center as well. Since those inside the NCC were following all the events unfolding on 9/11. |
|
Data: 2009-03-12 11:55:02 | |
Autor: jadrys | |
Proba wylapania lobuzow, bardzo slaba | |
ColgatesBilly pisze:
Can you tell me and Jadrys what here is walking? Stupidities, mister Billy.. Really only excrements.. -- Linuks to system dla myślących użytkowników.. Ja A Debian jest pierwszym sekretarzem tego systemu... Również ja |
|
Data: 2009-03-12 13:59:45 | |
Autor: ColgatesBilly | |
Proba wylapania lobuzow, bardzo slaba | |
"jadrys" <andrzej203@op.pl> wrote in message news:gpapml$qd7$1news.onet.pl... ColgatesBilly pisze: I am careful that he is flying with us in dick ( uwazam, ze leci z nami w... ;) P-Kol |
|
Data: 2009-03-12 14:02:06 | |
Autor: jadrys | |
Proba wylapania lobuzow, bardzo slaba | |
ColgatesBilly pisze:
Impossible ! -- Linuks to system dla myślących użytkowników.. Ja A Debian jest pierwszym sekretarzem tego systemu... Również ja |
|
Data: 2009-03-12 10:44:37 | |
Autor: jadrys | |
Proba wylapania lobuzow, bardzo slaba | |
It was it been possible how much? :-D -- Linuks to system dla myślących użytkowników.. Ja A Debian jest pierwszym sekretarzem tego systemu... Również ja |