On May 13, 2:55 pm, Me <agnesche...@gmail.com> wrote:

  OPEN LETTER

RE: PUBLIC EFFECT OF THE BOOK

DEAR PUBLISHER

There is an issue. Even in 1999 it was known how brain used functional
circutry

( FUNCTIONLA BRAIN BY A LURIA AND OTHERS) , that  it is using only
10% or less its neutons rest being available later; that the same
animal decay of neutrons does
 not apply to humans as we are going up when animals stay same ( and
teh like).

There is lots of selective information that has completely decayed
since, but even thanw as not true.
Sometimes, people believe in what they want to believe to steal
someone else young brain.

Both are wrong. What I am writing about is - please ask expert to
evaluate that ionformation in the book
and put up upodate fast. You have a lie way as the book is so old for
the science progress asses, but the bases
for which is written - to keep transplantimng brains using the  same
faulty arguments

NOT ALL THESE WERE ALL TE TIMES OBVIEUS TO ME, BUT AT THE NYSC
NEUROGROWTH WAS ON TE AGENDA I 2003 ON VERY FREEQUENTLY,
WITH CONFERENCES HELD INTERNATIONALLY; THUS INFORMATION ON TEH
PROGRESSION IN TEH UNDERSTANDING NEUROGROWTH IN ADULT IS AVAILABLE

OTHER THAT I NEED TO MENTION IS THAT THERE IS A BIAS
( not only that other get away with responsibility claming that brain
is foreign on them)
FROM NOT THINKING CLEARLY ABOUT HOW WE ARE AFFECTED AND WHGEN WE NEED
TO DIE
( I efend you here; as after Obama ambush at my work i conted taht i
work 30 yaers plus 20-30; than
changes mind after I rewired brain - that 50 work years is easy, rest
i do not know; now my brain
created perspective on self - i am sure it is not les thamn 50 years -
i am stabilized in that based
on my life history and how my brain picked after the menopause - this
was claimed in 2003 publically
taht women do not slow at all moreover have joy, while male offenders
Drs lied about it;
Anyway after Icorrcted a lot of my image that is where I am without
any step growing my brain copy
- i do not want it and I know why ; quality of tissue!

   ( you thonght how jucy it is - exactly - what is jucy? one taht
tansfer significant messages
daily or the one that is aneat nice fluffy fresh plasma like but does
not strain; IS THAT EVER RESOLVED YET?

IN THAT BOOK BY OXFORD UNI TAHT USES RESEARCH AUTHORITATIVELY BUT IN
BIAS WAY - NO

I DO NOT KNWO ALL BUT I KNOW TAHT WHEN I INTENSELY EXERCISED
METHODICALLY AL
BRAIN SOLIDIFIED CALCIFICATION APPROPRIATE FOR MY AGE DISSEAPERED - NO
SPOT NOW;
( so lie that brain has to go bad - but that lie came from reseach on
anu=imals - and where is the proof taht we do what animals do?
- I HAVE MORE DIRRECT BUT NEW OBSERVATION ON THIS ASPECT OF ARGUMNENTS
- IT IS SEMICONFIDENTIAL BUT I CHOSE BY HIGHER GOOD SINCE ALL SENATE
READS ME
SCARED OF THSI CONTRAVERSY AND IMPROPER CONSULTATION -
PROFESSIONALSBE
GUITY IF THEY WERE CALLED TO TESTIFY NOT A SENATE ( I AM NOT
ABOLISHING ALL
REPLACEMNST IN THIS ARGMUMENT - I AM SAYING THAT WE DO NOT RAHAbLITATE
AGING
 BRAINS OR TRANSPLANTED BRAINS CORReCTLY)
WHAT ANIMALS CAN DO DIFFERENT - NOT HAVING SPEACH THEY DO NOT HAVE THE
CORE LEYER
 IN TEH CORTEXT TAHT SPEACH IS ENCODED AND THE NETWORK IN BRAIN WHERE
SPEACH
CROSSED WITH ALL OTHER FUNCTIONS VISUAL SPACIALS AND THE ABSTRUCT
THINKING.
THEY DO NOT HAVE IT - BUT THE ONE THAT LIE ABOUT RAIN COME UP WITH
CRAP -
WE DO NOT KNOW - THE TRUTH IS WQE KNOW! aLSO, WHEN WE HAD h BOMB THERE
W=ERE TWO MIDNIGHT CRISES OVER THE HEAVY
CYCLING/ SWITCHINGPARTICLES, I DO NOT KNOW IF INVOKED EXPERIMENTALLY
OR NOT
AND WE WERE ON MY LKINE GUESING WHAT WILL HAPPEN - WE OLDER GO FIRST? R
\TEAENS OR INFANTS
( YOU KNOW HOW WE BIAS: DO?MALLS WIL HAVE TO PAY - FAULT! NO NURSERY
WA SAFFECTED - WA SCYCLING TEH PARTCICLES AS THEY ASRE CLOSER TO TEH
NEW PLASMA  - THSI MOGHT BE DOUBLE EDGE RAMIFICATION - I AM SURE LABS
ARE PUPPING UP NOW TO ANSWER -
BUT THESE WERE 2 DIFFERENT CRISES I DO NOT KNOW HOW CAUSED AND WAHT
THE DIFFERENCE - IN TEH SECIND ONE WE EXPECTED THAT ELDRIES AND
INFANTS WILL GO AND ELDERIED HELD . YOU AHVE TOCHACK WITH ATHOMICS
WHAT
WERE THSE SHIFTS ABOUT. TEH SECOND CRISES AFFECTED TEENS ONLY
WE INTERPRETED IT THAN AS TEEN PATTEN FOR MANAGING CAHANGE IS STILL
VULNERABLE AND THAT
 PARTICLE SHIFTING  CROSSLREAKTED ( WITHOUT SPECIFICITY) PERHAPS
CORRECTLY INTERPERETED.

FACTOR THESE IN - WHERE ARE THE PROVES AND ABOUT WHAT - THAT WE BIAS
AGAINST OUTSELVES
IN SO MANY WAYS?

PROBABLE  AS FAR AS I CAN SEE.

fIRST,THINK ALL OVE R CLEARER AND DO NOT LET LIERS SELL YOU SOMEONE
ELSE BRAINS
 AS THAT SI  A CRIME EVEN IF SENATE APPROCVED IT -
THAT IS WHAT TEH FUNCTIONS OF CONSCEIOUNCE IS .

WE MIGHT GET TAT PLASMATIC ADVANTAGE BUT THE NEW PLASMA DID NOT CODED
THE
WIRING FOR THE PATTERN RECOGNOISTION THAT IS BNELIEVED THAT WE DO
WELL
AFTER 50 ( WHILE YOU HACKING VERY YOUNG BRAINS) AND ACCUM=ULATED LIFE
EXPERIENCE CALLED WISDOM - YOU DO NOT HAVE IT AND YOU EVEN LO,MK LIKE
PLUS REFUSE TO REASOMN ABOUT THESE - PROBABLY BECAUSE THE SO CALLED
EGO FUNCTION - WHO YOU ARE AFTER THE TRANSPLANT IS TOO COM PROMIZED.

YOU HAVE WORK IT A NEW AND NOT CHECAT SELF.
ON TEH BALANCE - WHEN NED THE PHYSOCAL NEW TISSUE ;' I WOUDL
BET - VERY LATE IN LIFE OR NONE.
ANALYZE A NEW. i ALSO SUGGESTED TO SE STRUCTURE OF KNOWLEDGE TAHT
PHILOSOPHY
 LIES TO BRAG ABOUT BUT STAYS DISORGANIZED IN IT.
FOR THE BRAIN THIS WOUDL BE NOT DISORFGANIZED BUT WE DID NOPT EVEN GET
THERE

WHEN IDEA WAS FRESH ABOUT TRANSPLANTS PEOPLE DID N OT EVEN KNOW ABOUT
THE LOCALIZATION OPF FUNCTIONS. SINCE THAN WE PROGRESSED SO MUCH BUT
THINKING ABOUT SELF EITHER IS ARCHAIC OR REGRESSED ( ON TEH DEFENEC
THAT THIS
IS SO WANDERFUYL WHY BOTHER WITH TE ETHICS OF IT - TRAPPED IN
CONTRADICTION)

AND THERE SI MORE - THSI NEEDS PUBLISHING WELL AS YOU DO TO DISCUSS
MORE AND NOT LESS.

Neurons, by the way rebuid, and the human body also looks very fresh
with the proper maintenance.

We need body rehabilitation strategies published well. Brains? Maybe
but we need to understand the truth first.

Perhaps you will come with more comprehensive understanding of adult
neurogrowth. Please publish.

A Cherry

...........

AND NOW ORDEE  FOR THE SENATE

1 , INQUIRE FIRST WITHIN RELEVANT DISCIPLINES
NEUROSCIENCES
STEM CELL GROPWTH PEOPLE
BIO-ENGINERES
EVOLUTIONISTS
AGE SPECIALISTS
NASA SCEINTISTS ( NECESSARY BUT SOME NASA WHILE THE MINE
 INFO NEVER HEARD ABOUT NEUROSCIENCE APPLICATION ISPACE)
CLUSTER PROJECTS SPECIALISTS
AND OTHERS, sport specialists
neurosurgents
therapists that know about brain body disconnect
rehabilitation specialists
computer programers for teh rehab programs
structure analysanst ( I has such in my class)


  HOW MUCH TIME THEY NEED FOR TEH CONDENSE REPORT ON TEH QUESTIONS
TAHT YOU ALL LIST FIST AND THAN HAVE THE
  MINIMIZERS WELL CONDENSE THENM FOR SCEINTIST ( i gave then a task
but i wande r how good tehy are;
who can well put the inquery to condensed form ; you have to anser
open question:
which specific info you need to say with clarity when and who is to
get aproval for full and partial brain transplant?

Ity should be all asked taht  you need to vote.

2. have a conference and specify which expert and why ypu will call

3, call expoerts as this is hot doifficult and responsible lehgal
issue

   have scientists help you intergrate as tehse arguments are
complicated.

4. Vote on specificity.

outlaw all picking and framing people - yourt liberty is the same like
mine, criminals

 there be only voluntary NASA when we trought GET IT - prepare self
for it.

See you