G8 Leaders to End Global Warming with Nuclear Fusion

TO THE BEST, THEY DID NOT DO SUCH THING THAN OR LATER ; ESPECIALLY IN
FEBRUARY 2006

February 6, 2006
by Kelly Richardson
Technology-Schools Columnist

A new trend in environmental science calls for the use of nuclear
fusion as a way to satisfy our need for energy without compromising
the global warming factor.

Nuclear fusion mimics the way the sun produces energy.
GOD HAVE MERCY - THEY ARE LYING IN PEOPLES FACE.
 This method could potentially provide a nearly inexhaustible
supply of low-cost, clean, and non-radioactive energy using sea water
as fuel.

THEY FIGHT FOR SUPREMACY WITH THE OVERPOWERING NATURE USING THAT
TRADITIONAL FUSSION. IS THAT BY ANY CHANCE SPLITTING TE ATOM?


The Environmental Science of Nuclear Fusion:
Splitting atoms through fission results in a variety of dangerous
after-products that have been shown to damage the environment.

NO, OPPOSITE SEEMS TO BE TRUE, BUT THERE IS NO EASY BASELINE FOR
COMPARISON, ESPECIALLY WHEN NATO LANCJHES NUCLEAR SWIP FREEQUENTLY
BEFORE THE EARTH PROCESSES EVEN RICHED PLATOU/ OR OWN BALANCE.

FISSSION IN THE DRY TAKES ONLY 2-3 TO DISSIPATE ALL CONDITIONS; IT DID
NOT MAKE PARTICLES SMALLER ( UNLIKE FUSION OR ALL SORT OF PARTIAL
PARTICLE INJECT THAT WE HAD IN WASHINGTONM DC DAY IN AND OUT FOR
NEARLY 2 YEARS

Fusion's byproducts are benign.

REALLY, WHY NY STINKED FOR 2 YEARS WITH THE ATOMIC WASTE AND WAS NOT
EVEN CLENED WITH ALL THESE GREAT FUSSION METHODS; BY THE WAY THEY SEEM
TO BE GOOD.
THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE "OWNERS" OF THE REACTOR FIGHT FOR THE ULTIMATE
HIGHT WITH THE BIG BLAST AND NOT FOR ANY CLEAN WORLD. ( but here in
Burligton they do not even want ownership - they want to give it to
maniacs to kill self - they
want to "own" the area by investing from the outside, and not even
askinmg people here what they want).