( prosze sprawdzic kontekst, w ktorym technika sama 'chce' przejac
substancje nawet na poziomie slow; i co to znaczy w konsekwencjach)


 Science Revolution: Application of blosoming neuroimaging techniques.
WORD OF COTION
  AGAINST FIXING THE IMAGES


WORD OF COTION ABOUT fMRI IN PARTICULAR - IT IS LIKE THE LIGHT
REFLEXION OR
THE  SHADOW - THEY CAN BE TAKEN BY LIGHT OR WAVE OR EATEN UP BY THE
OTHER EXITATION OF THE NEURAL MATTER THAT IS READ. IT IS ONLY
'FUNCTIONAL' ( AS OPPOSE, STRUCTURAL) AND ONLY UPON THE STABILISED
BODY FOR THE GIVEN MONENT IN TIME, THEY HAVE SUCH A DEFINITE MEANING
AS THEIR STATED
ANALYSES OF PATTERN REVEAL. THE INTERPRETATIONS HAVE TO BE WELL
GROUNDED. THE OVESTATEMENTS ARE VERY LIKELY.

THE WORD 'PARADIGMS' IN   IN THE INTERPRETATION BELOW NEEDS TO BE ONLY
'PATTERNS AS READ' AND CONDITIONS OF THAT READING SPECIFIED.

  ( BY THE WAY, PARADIGMS ARE AXIOMATIC, meaning that THE INPUT is
first guaranted  thus THE OUTPUT is valid only under the condition
GIVEN, speaking general here; thus
not really individual dignosed but the infered overall pattern; IT IS
NOT EXCLUDED THAT
THESE DISTRIBUTORS OF INSTRUMENTS FOR NEUROIMAGING REPORT THE
ACTIVITIES OF CHIPS IN BRAIN, CONFUSING THE SCIENCE COMMUNITY AND
LIMITING THE HUMAN CAPACITY FOR SELF PERCEPTION  AND SELF
UNDERSTANDING - WHILE GETTING ROBOT LIKE;

AND - IN CASE ANYONE FORGETS - ROBOTS ARE NOT THE HIGHER SPECIES TO
HUMANS)

from Brussels:

"When you are thinking about something (let's say a bird), fMRI can
show which voxels are activated (let's say voxels 33-52-20 and
34-12-40). Mind reading through functional MRI is inverting this
relationship: if fMRI shows you are activating voxels 33-52-20 and
34-12-40, can we guess you are thinking about a bird ?

Several group have taken up this challenge, using artificial
intelligence techniques to infer subjects' thoughts or actions from
patterns of pixels activated in fMRI images.

For example: the hippocampus is known to process experience into
memories and to be involved in the recall of spatial locations. With
stimuli generated by a virtual reality system, Hassabis et al. asked
subjects to virtually move between 8 locations within 2 rooms. Using a
pattern classification algorithm to analyse the fMRI results, they
were able to guess at which location the subjects were standing at a
given moment from the pattern of activation of specific voxels in
their hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus."

THIS LAST ONE SEEMS TO BE A NEW WAY OF ANALYSING  AND APPLYING
PATTERNS
in functional brain.

BUT HOW FAR DO WE WANT TO GO - DO WE REALLY NEED TO GUES AS MUCH ABOUT
PEOPLE AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE.

EACH APPLICATION ACHIEVEMENTS HAS ITS COUNTER ( LIKE IN PHYSICAL
SCIENCES -ACTION AND REACTION) OR THE SOCIAL MOVEMENTS. IF WE PUSH
THIS APLICATION, GIVEN THAT EVEN SINCE ANNOUNCEMENT OF THIS TECHNIQUE,
THE SENSATIVITY OF FUNCTIONAL INSTRUMENTS LIKE THIS fMRI RISES
STEADILY, THAN
THE COUNTER - REACTION READINGS WILL WASH OUT THE ORIGINAL GAIN
( if these reads are not on half robots already but for the robots
there be the wall effect too)
THAT IS THE NATURE OF THE TOOL 'GOOD FAIGHT', when the highly nanon-
nized field dances all around its cycle - there is only as much to go;
but what si worse is the temtation to invent these patterns thus limit
human activity by narowing them.

IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THE DISTRIBUTION IF SUCH INSTRUMENTS NEEDS TO BE
VIA PROFESSIONAL CHANNELS AND UNDER THE LAB AND SCIENTISTS LICENCE,
SIMILARLY TO OTHE PROFESSIONAL TOOLS.

ALL CLINICAL APLICATIONS, AS ATTEMPTED ON THIS RELEASE AS WELL, NEED
TO BE FOR PROFESSIONALS ONLY AS THE SOURCE IS PROTECTED, TECHNIQUES
SHOULD BE
AND THE CROSS APPLICATION INCLUDING ANY SO POPULAR IN USA / LONDON
LEGAL ACTION THAT COULD USE SUCH DATA. THE EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQQUES,
AS THIS ONE CLEARLY IS, HAVE TO BE RESERVED TO BE USED UNDER THE
AGREEMENT FOR THE EXPERIMENT ON THE PERSONS THAT WILL GIVE THE READ
OUT TO THE PRODUCER
AND OR THE CONSUMER OF THE PRODUCT - they have to agree to it, when
the consent agreement clearly specified what the technique data
collection is about.

NOT ALL PEOPLE THAT WILL BE ASKED TO GIVE THE fMRI READ WILL DISCOVER
THE LIMITATIONS; I AM NOT SURE THAT THEY ARE TOLD ABOUT THESE AHEAD OF
THE READ.

THE SELLER OF THE PRODUCT DID THE OPPOSITE - ADVERTISED AND
PROPAGATED  THESE WITH CLINICAL DATA AS IF 'PARADIGMS' - UNCHANGIBLE;
AS IF WRITTEN IN STONE ALREADY, THUS CONTRADICTING SELF ALREADY - IT
STARTED WITH FUNCTINAL PATTERNS ONLY, THAT STAY FUNCTIONAL AND FLUID
( untill people injured
by chipping their neural tissue, and by fixing interpretations)

OPPORTUNITY FOR MISUSE IS WIDE.