Nie moge sie doczytac; A sprawdzam czy PAN BOG IM POZWOLIL JAKO ZE TO
OBRAZA TYKO LUDZI IINSTUTUCJE LUDZKIE (  a co - kontakty seksualne z
dziecmi w kazdej formie wlaczaczajac US codified 4 th degree felony;
kontakty z kobietami i meczyznami bez zwaizaku malzenskiego)


 Part One

SUBSTANTIVE NORMS


Art. 1

§ 1. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, according to art.
52 of the Apostolic Constitution Pastor Bonus[1], judges delicts
against the faith, as well as the more grave delicts committed against
morals and in the celebration of the sacraments and, whenever
necessary, proceeds to declare or impose canonical sanctions according
to the norm of both common and proper law, with due regard for the
competence of the Apostolic Penitentiary[2] and in keeping with Agendi
ratio in doctrinarum examine.[3]


§ 2. With regard to the delicts mentioned above in § 1, the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, by mandate of the Roman
Pontiff, may judge Cardinals, Patriarchs, Legates of the Apostolic
See, Bishops as well as other physical persons mentioned in can. 1405
§ 3 of the Code of Canon Law[4], and in can. 1061 of the Code of
Canons of the Eastern Churches.[5]


§ 3. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith judges the
reserved delicts mentioned in § 1 according to the following norms.


Art. 2

§ 1. The delicts against the faith referred to in art. 1 are heresy,
apostasy and schism according to the norm of can. 751 [6] and 1364 [7]
of the Code of Canon Law, and can. 1436[8] and 1437[9] of the Code of
Canons of the Eastern Churches.


§ 2. In the abovementioned cases referred to in § 1, it pertains to
the Ordinary or Hierarch to remit, by norm of law, if it be the case,
the latae sententiae excommunication and likewise to undertake a
judicial trial in the first instance or issue an extrajudicial decree,
with due regard for the right of appeal or of recourse to the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Art. 3

§ 1. The more grave delicts against the sanctity of the most Holy
Sacrifice and Sacrament of the Eucharist reserved to the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith for judgment are:

1° the taking or retaining for a sacrilegious purpose or the throwing
away of the consecrated species[10], as mentioned in can. 1367 of the
Code of Canon Law[11], and in can. 1442 of the Code of Canons of the
Eastern Churches[12];

2° attempting the liturgical action of the Eucharistic Sacrifice
spoken of in can. 1378 § 2, n. 1, of the Code of Canon Law[13];

3° the simulation of the same, spoken of in can. 1379 of the Code of
Canon Law[14] and in can. 1443 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern
Churches[15];

4° the concelebration of the Eucharistic Sacrifice prohibited in can.
908 of the Code of Canon Law[16], and in can. 702 of the Code of
Canons of the Eastern Churches[17], spoken of in can. 1365 of the Code
of Canon Law[18], and in can. 1440 of the Code of Canons of the
Eastern Churches[19], with ministers of ecclesial communities which do
not have apostolic succession and do not acknowledge the sacramental
dignity of priestly ordination.

§ 2. Also reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
is the delict which consists in the consecration for a sacrilegious
purpose of one matter without the other or even of both, either within
or outside of the eucharistic celebration[20]. One who has perpetrated
this delict is to be punished according to the gravity of the crime,
not excluding dismissal or deposition.


Art. 4


§ 1. The more grave delicts against the sanctity of the Sacrament of
Penance reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
are:


1° the absolution of an accomplice in a sin against the sixth
commandment of the Decalogue, mentioned in can. 1378 § 1 of the Code
of Canon Law[21], and in can. 1457 of the Code of Canons of the
Eastern Churches[22];


2° attempted sacramental absolution or the prohibited hearing of
confession, mentioned in can. 1378 § 2, 2° of the Code of Canon
Law[23];


3° simulated sacramental absolution, mentioned in can. 1379 of the
Code of Canon Law[24],and in can. 1443 of the Code of Canons of the
Eastern Churches[25];


4° the solicitation to a sin against the sixth commandment of the
Decalogue in the act, on the occasion, or under the pretext of
confession, as mentioned in can. 1387 of the Code of Canon Law[26],
and in can. 1458 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches[27], if
it is directed to sinning with the confessor himself;


5° the direct and indirect violation of the sacramental seal,
mentioned in can. 1388 § 1 of the Code of Canon Law[28],and in can.
1456 §1 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches[29];


§ 2. With due regard for § 1, n. 5, also reserved to the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith is the more grave delict which consists
in the recording, by whatever technical means, or in the malicious
diffusion through communications media, of what is said in sacramental
confession, whether true or false, by the confessor or the penitent.
Anyone who commits such a delict is to punished according to the
gravity of the crime, not excluding, if he be a cleric, dismissal or
deposition[30].


Art. 5



The more grave delict of the attempted sacred ordination of a woman is
also reserved to the

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith:


1° With due regard for can. 1378 of the Code of Canon Law, both the
one who attempts to confer sacred ordination on a woman, and she who
attempts to receive sacred ordination, incurs a latae sententiae
excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See.


2° If the one attempting to confer sacred ordination, or the woman who
attempts to receive sacred ordination, is a member of the Christian
faithful subject to the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, with
due regard for can. 1443 of that Code, he or she is to be punished by
major excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See.


3° If the guilty party is a cleric he may be punished by dismissal or
deposition[31].


Art. 6


§ 1. The more grave delicts against morals which are reserved to the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith are:


1° the delict against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue committed
by a cleric with a minor below the age of eighteen years; in this
case, a person who habitually lacks the use of reason is to be
considered equivalent to a minor.


2° the acquisition, possession, or distribution by a cleric of
pornographic images of minors under the age of fourteen, for purposes
of sexual gratification, by whatever means or using whatever
technology;


§ 2. A cleric who commits the delicts mentioned above in § 1 is to be
punished according to the gravity of his crime, not excluding
dismissal or deposition.

Art. 7


§ 1. A criminal action for delicts reserved to the Congregation for
the Doctrine of the Faith is extinguished by prescription after twenty
years, with due regard to the right of the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith to derogate from prescription in individual
cases.


§ 2. Prescription runs according to the norm of can. 1362 § 2 of the
Code of Canon Law[32], and can. 1152 § 3 of the Code of Canons of the
Eastern Churches[33]. However, in the delict mentioned in art. 6 §1 n.
1, prescription begins to run from the day on which a minor completes
his eighteenth year of age.




Part Two

PROCEDURAL NORMS

Title I

The Constitution and Competence of the Tribunal


Art. 8



§ 1. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is the Supreme
Apostolic Tribunal for the Latin Church as well as the Eastern
Catholic Churches, for the judgment of the delicts defined in the
preceding articles.


§ 2. This Supreme Tribunal also judges other delicts of which a
defendant is accused by the Promotor of Justice, by reason of
connection of person and complicity.


§ 3. The sentences of this Supreme Tribunal, rendered within the
limits of its proper competence, do not need to be submitted for the
approval of the Supreme Pontiff.


Art. 9


§ 1. The Members of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith are
ipso iure the judges of this Supreme Tribunal.


§ 2. The Prefect of the Congregation presides as first among equals
over the college of the Members, and if the office of Prefect is
vacant or if the Prefect himself is impeded, the Secretary of the
Congregation carries out his duties.


§ 3. It is the responsibility of the Prefect of the Congregation to
nominate additional stable or deputed judges.


Art. 10

It is necessary that such appointed judges be priests, of mature age,
possessing a doctorate in canon law, outstanding in good morals,
prudence and expertise in the law. Such priests may at the same time
exercise a judicial or consultative function before another Dicastery
of the Roman Curia.



Art. 11


To present and sustain an accusation a Promotor of Justice is to be
appointed, who is to be a priest, possessing a doctorate in canon law,
outstanding in good morals, prudence, and expertise in the law. He is
to carry out his office in all grades of judgment.


Art. 12



For the functions of Notary and Chancellor, priests are appointed,
whether or not they are officials of this Congregation.


Art. 13



The role of Advocate or Procurator is carried out by a priest
possessing a doctorate in canon law. He is to be approved by the
presiding judge of the college.



Art. 14


Indeed, in the other tribunals dealing with cases under these norms,
only priests can validly carry out the functions of Judge, Promotor of
Justice, Notary, and Patron [Procurator and Advocate].


Art 15


With regard to the provisions of can. 1421 of the Code of Canon
Law[34],and can. 1087 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern
Churches[35], the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith may
dispense from the requirements of the priesthood and of a doctorate in
Canon Law.


Art. 16


Whenever the Ordinary or Hierarch receives a report of a more grave
delict, which has at least the semblance of truth, once the
preliminary investigation has been completed, he is to communicate the
matter to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith which, unless
it calls the case to itself due to particular circumstances, will
direct the Ordinary or Hierarch how to proceed further, with due
regard, however, for the right to appeal, if the case warrents,
against a sentence of the first instance only to the Supreme Tribunal
of this same Congregation.


Art. 17


If a case is referred directly to the Congregation without a
preliminary investigation having been undertaken, the steps
preliminary to the process, which fall by common law to the Ordinary
or Hierarch, may be carried out by the Congregation itself.


Art. 18



With full respect for the right of defense, the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith may sanate acts in cases lawfully presented to
it if merely procedural laws have been violated by lower Tribunals
acting by mandate of the same Congregation or according to art. 16.



Art. 19


With due regard for the right of the Ordinary to impose from the
outset of the preliminary investigation those measures which are
established in can. 1722 of the Code of Canon Law[36], or in can. 1473
of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches[37], the respective
presiding judge may, at the request of the Promotor of Justice,
exercise the same power under the same conditions determined in the
canons themselves.


Art. 20


The Supreme Tribunal of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
judges in second instance:


1° cases adjudicated in first instance by lower tribunals;


2° cases decided by this same Supreme Apostolic Tribunal in first
instance.



Title II


The Procedure to be followed in the Judicial Trial



Art. 21



§ 1. The more grave delicts reserved to the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith are to be tried in a judicial process.


§ 2. However, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith may:


1° decide, in individual cases, ex officio or when requested by the
Ordinary or Hierarch, to proceed by extrajudicial decree, as provided
in can. 1720 of the Code of Canon Law[38] and can. 1486 of the Code of
Canons of the Eastern Churches[39]. However, perpetual expiatory
penalties may only be imposed by mandate of the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith.


2° present the most grave cases to the decision of the Roman Pontiff
with regard to dismissal from the clerical state or deposition,
together with dispensation from the law of celibacy, when it is
manifestly evident that the delict was committed and after having
given the guilty party the possibility of defending himself.



Art. 22


The Prefect is to constitute a turnus of three or five judges to try
the case.



Art. 23



If in the appellate stage the Promotor of Justice brings forward a
specifically different accusation, this Supreme Tribunal can admit it
and judge it as if at first instance.




Art. 24


§ 1. In cases concerning the delicts mentioned of in art. 4 §1, the
Tribunal cannot indicate the name of the accuser to either the accused
or his patron unless the accuser has expressly consented.



§ 2. This same Tribunal must consider the particular importance of the
question concerning the credibility of the accuser.


§ 3. Nevertheless, it must always be observed that any danger of
violating the sacramental seal be altogether avoided.


Art 25


If an incidental question arises, the college is to decide the matter
by decree most expeditiously [expeditissime, cf. cann. 1629, n.5˚ CIC;
1310, n. 5˚ CCEO].



Art. 26


§ 1. With due regard for the right to appeal to this Supreme Tribunal,
once an instance has been finished in any manner before another
tribunal, all of the acts of the case are to be transmitted ex officio
to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith as soon as possible.



§ 2 The right of the Promotor of Justice of the Congregation to
challenge a sentence runs from the day on which the sentence of first
instance is made known to this same Promotor.


Art. 27


Recourse may be had against singular administrative acts which have
been decreed or approved by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith in cases of reserved delicts. Such recourse must be presented
within the preemptory period of sixty canonical days to the Ordinary
Session of the Congregation (the Feria IV) which will judge on the
merits of the case and the lawfulness of the Decree. Any further
recourse as mentioned in art. 123 of the Apostolic Constitution Pastor
bonus is excluded[40].


Art. 28


A res iudicata occurs:


1° if a sentence has been rendered in second instance;

2° if an appeal against a sentence has not been proposed within a
month;

3° if, in the appellate grade, the instance is abated or is renounced;

4° if the sentence has been rendered in accord with the norm of art.
20.


Art. 29


§ 1. Judicial expenses are to be paid as the sentence has determined.


§ 2. If the defendant is not able to pay the expenses, they are to be
paid by the Ordinary or Hierarch of the case.



Art. 30



§ 1. Cases of this nature are subject to the pontifical secret.[41]


§ 2. Whoever has violated the secret, whether deliberately (ex dolo)
or through grave negligence, and has caused some harm to the accused
or to the witnesses, is to be punished with an appropriate penalty by
the higher turnus at the insistence of the injured party or even ex
officio.



Art. 31


In these cases, together with the prescripts of these norms, by which
all Tribunals of the Latin Church and Eastern Catholic Churches are
bound, the canons concerning delicts and penalties as well as the
canons concerning the penal process of each Code also must be applied.



Nie wim czemu przezutka na Lacine tu wlasnie:


[1] Ioannes Paulus PP. II, Constitutio apostolica Pastor bonus, De
Romana Curia, 28 iunii 1988, art. 52, in AAS 80 (1988) 874: ÂŤDelicta
contra fidem necnon graviora delicta, tum contra mores tum in
sacramentorum celebratione commissa, quae ipsi delata fuerint,
cognoscit atque, ubi opus fuerit, ad canonicas sanctiones declarandas
aut irrogandas ad normam iuris, sive communis sive proprii, proceditÂť.

[2] Ioannes Paulus PP. II, Constitutio apostolica Pastor bonus, De
Romana Curia, 28 iunii 1988, art. 118, in AAS 80 (1988) 890: ÂŤPro foro
interno, tum sacramentali tum non sacramentali, absolutiones,
dispensationes, commutationes, sanationes, condonationes aliasque
gratias eadem largiturÂť.

[3] Congregatio pro Doctrina Fidei, Agendi ratio in doctrinarum
examine, 29 iunii 1997, in AAS 89 (1997) 830-835.

[4] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1405 - § 3. Rotae Romanae reservatur
iudicare:

1° Episcopos in contentiosis, firmo praescripto can. 1419 § 2;

2° Abbatem primatem, vel Abbatem superiorem congregationis monasticae,
et supremum Moderatorem institutorum religiosorum iuris pontificii;

3° dioeceses aliasve personas ecclesiasticas, sive physicas sive
iuridicas, quae Superiorem infra Romanum Pontificem non habent.

[5] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1061 – Coram
tribunalibus Sedis Apostolicae conveniri debent personae, quae
auctoritatem superiorem infra Romanum pontificem non habent, sive sunt
personae physicae in ordine episcopatus non constitutae sive sunt
personae iuridicae salvo can. 1063 § 4 nn. 3 et 4.

[6] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 751 - Dicitur haeresis, pertinax, post
receptum baptismum, alicuius veritatis fide divina et catholica
credendae denegatio, aut de eadem pertinax dubitatio; apostasia, fidei
christianae ex toto repudiatio; schisma, subiectionis Summo Pontifici
aut communionis cum Ecclesiae membris eidem subditis detrectatio.

[7] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1364 - § 1. Apostata a fide, haereticus
vel schismaticus in excommunicationem latae sententiae incurrit, firmo
praescripto can. 194, § 1, n. 2; clericus praeterea potest poenis, de
quibus in can. 1336, § 1, nn. 1, 2 et 3, puniri. - § 2. Si diuturna
contumacia vel scandali gravitas postulet, aliae poenae addi possunt,
non excepta dimissione e statu clericali.

[8] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1436 - § 1. Qui
aliquam veritatem fide divina et catholica credendam denegat vel eam
in dubium ponit aut fidem christianam ex toto repudiat et legitime
monitus non resipiscit, ut haereticus aut apostata excommunicatione
maiore puniatur, clericus praeterea aliis poenis puniri potest non
exclusa depositione.

[9] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1437 - Qui
subiectionem supremae Ecclesiae auctoritati aut communionem cum
christifidelibus eidem subiectis detrectat et legitime monitus
oboedientiam non praestat, ut schismaticus excommunicatione maiore
puniatur.

[10] Pontificium Consilium de Legum Textibus Interpretandis, Responsio
ad propositum dubium, 4 iunii 1999 in AAS 91 (1999) 918.
D. Utrum in can. 1367 CIC et 1442 CCEO verbum ÂŤabicereÂť intellegatur
tantum ut actus proiciendi necne.
R. Negative et ad mentem.
Mens est quamlibet actionem Sacras Species voluntarie et graviter
despicientem censendam esse inclusam in verbo ÂŤabicereÂť.

[11] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1367 - Qui species consecratas abicit
aut in sacrilegum finem abducit vel retinet, in excommunicationem
latae sententiae Sedi Apostolicae reservatam incurrit; clericus
praeterea alia poena, non exclusa dimissione e statu clericali, puniri
potest.

[12] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1442 - Qui Divinam
Eucharistiam abiecit aut in sacrilegum finem abduxit vel retinuit,
excommunicatione maiore puniatur et, si clericus est, etiam aliis
poenis non exclusa depositione.

[13] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1378 - § 2. In poenam latae sententiae
interdicti vel, si sit clericus, suspensionis incurrit:

1° qui ad ordinem sacerdotalem non promotus liturgicam eucharistici
Sacrificii actionem attentat ...

[14] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1379 - Qui, praeter casus de quibus in
can. 1378, sacramentum se administrare simulat, iusta poena puniatur.

[15] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1443 - Qui Divinae
Liturgiae vel aliorum sacramentorum celebrationem simulavit, congrua
poena puniatur non exclusa excommunicatione maiore.

[16] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 908 - Sacerdotibus catholicis vetitum
est una cum sacerdotibus vel ministris Ecclesiarum communitatumve
ecclesialium plenam communionem cum Ecclesia catholica non habentium,
Eucharistiam concelebrare.

[17] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 702 - Sacerdotes
catholici vetiti sunt una cum sacerdotibus vel ministris acatholicis
Divinam Liturgiam concelebrare.

[18] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1365 - Reus vetitae communicationis in
sacris iusta poena puniatur.

[19] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1440 - Qui normas
iuris de communicatione in sacris violat, congrua poena puniri
potest.

[20] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 927 - Nefas est, urgente etiam extrema
necessitate, alteram materiam sine altera, aut etiam utramque extra
eucharisticam celebrationem, consecrare.

[21] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1378 - § 1. Sacerdos qui contra
praescriptum can. 977 agit, in excommunicationem latae sententiae Sedi
Apostolicae reservatam incurrit.

[22] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1457 - Sacerdos, qui
complicem in peccato contra castitatem absolvit, excommunicatione
maiore puniatur firmo can. 728 § 1, n. 2.

[23] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1378 - § 2. In poenam latae sententiae
interdicti vel, si sit clericus, suspensionis incurrit: ... 2° qui,
praeter casum de quo in § 1, cum sacramentalem absolutionem dare
valide nequeat, eam impertire attentat, vel sacramentalem confessionem
audit.

[24] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1379 - Qui, praeter casus de quibus in
can. 1378, sacramentum se administrare simulat, iusta poena puniatur.

[25] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1443 - Qui Divinae
Liturgiae vel aliorum sacramentorum celebrationem simulavit, congrua
poena puniatur non exclusa excommunicatione maiore.

[26] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1387 - Sacerdos, qui in actu vel
occasione vel praetextu confessionis paenitentem ad peccatum contra
sextum Decalogi praeceptum sollicitat, pro delicti gravitate,
suspensione, prohibitionibus, privationibus puniatur, et in casibus
gravioribus dimittatur e statu clericali.

[27] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1458 - Sacerdos, qui
in actu vel occasione vel praetextu confessionis paenitentem ad
peccatum contra castitatem sollicitavit, congrua poena puniatur non
exclusa depositione.

[28] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1388 - § 1. Confessarius, qui
sacramentale sigillum directe violat, in excommunicationem latae
sententiae Sedi Apostolicae reservatam incurrit; qui vero indirecte
tantum, pro delicti gravitate puniatur.

[29] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1456 - § 1.
Confessarius, qui sacramentale sigillum directe violavit,
excommunicatione maiore puniatur firmo can. 728, § 1, n. 1; si vero
alio modo hoc sigillum fregit, congrua poena puniatur.

[30] Congregatio pro Doctrina Fidei, Decretum de sacramenti
Paenitentiae dignitate tuenda, 23 septembris 1988, in AAS 80 (1988)
1367.

[31] Congregatio pro Doctrina Fidei, Decretum generale de delicto
attentatae sacrae ordinationis mulieris, 19 decembris 2007, in AAS 100
(2008) 403.

[32] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1362 - § 2. Praescriptio decurrit ex
die quo delictum patratum est, vel, si delictum sit permanens vel
habituale, ex die quo cessavit.

[33] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1152 - § 3.
Praescriptio decurrit ex die, quo delictum patratum est, vel, si
delictum est permanens vel habituale, ex die, quo cessavit.

[34] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1421 -

§ 1. In dioecesi constituantur ab Episcopo iudices dioecesani, qui
sint clerici.

§ 2. Episcoporum conferentia permittere potest ut etiam laici iudices
constituantur, e quibus, suadente necessitate, unus assumi potest ad
collegium efformandum.

§ 3. Iudices sint integrae famae et in iure canonico doctores vel
saltem licentiati.

[35] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1087 -

§ 1. In eparchia nominentur ab Episcopo eparchiali iudices
eparchiales, qui sint clerici.

§ 2. Patriarcha consulta Synodo permanenti vel Metropolita, qui
Ecclesiae metropolitanae sui iuris praeest, consultis duobus Episcopis
eparchialibus ordinatione episcopali senioribus permittere potest, ut
etiam alii christifideles iudices nominentur, ex quibus suadente
necessitate unus assumi potest ad collegium efformandum; in ceteris
casibus hac in re adeatur Sedes Apostolica.

§ 3. Iudices sint integrae famae, in iure canonico doctores vel saltem
licentiati, prudentia et iustitiae zelo probati.

[36] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1722 - Ad scandala praevenienda, ad
testium libertatem protegendam et ad iustitiae cursum tutandum, potest
Ordinarius, audito promotore iustitiae et citato ipso accusato, in
quolibet processus stadio accusatum a sacro ministerio vel ab aliquo
officio et munere ecclesiastico arcere, ei imponere vel interdicere
commorationem in aliquo loco vel territorio, vel etiam publicam
sanctissimae Eucharistiae participationem prohibere; quae omnia, causa
cessante, sunt revocanda, eaque ipso iure finem habent, cessante
processu poenali.

[37] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1473 - Ad scandala
praevenienda, ad testium libertatem protegendam et ad iustitiae cursum
tuendum potest Hierarcha audito promotore iustitiae et citato ipso
accusato in quolibet statu et grado iudicii poenalis accusatum ab
exercitio ordinis sacri, officii, ministerii vel alterius muneris
arcere, ei imponere vel prohibere commorationem in aliquo loco vel
territorio, vel etiam publicam Divinae Eucharistiae susceptione
prohibere; quae omnia causa cessante sunt revocanda et ipso iure finem
habent cessante iudicio poenali.

[38] Codex Iuris Canonici, can. 1720 - Si Ordinarius censuerit per
decretum extra iudicium esse procedendum:

1° reo accusationem atque probationes, data facultate sese defendendi,
significet, nisi reus, rite vocatus, comparere neglexerit;

2° probationes et argumenta omnia cum duobus assessoribus accurate
perpendat;

3° si de delicto certo constet neque actio criminalis sit extincta,
decretum ferat ad normam cann. 1342-1350, expositis, breviter saltem,
rationibus in iure et in facto.

[39] Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, can. 1486 -

§ 1. Ad validitatem decreti, quo poena irrogatur, requiritur, ut:

1° accusatus de accusatione atque probationibus certior fiat data sibi
opportunitate ius ad sui defensionem plene exercendi, nisi ad normam
iuris citatus comparere neglexit;

2° discussio oralis inter Hierarcham vel eius delegatum et accusatum
habeatur praesentibus promotore iustitiae et notario;

3° in ipso decreto exponatur, quibus rationibus in facto et in iure
punitio innitatur.

§ 2. Poenae autem, de quibus in can. 1426, § 1, sine hac procedura
imponi possunt, dummodo de earum acceptatione ex parte rei scripto
constet.

[40] Ioannes Paulus PP. II, Constitutio apostolica Pastor bonus, De
Romana Curia, 28 iunii 1988, art. 52, in AAS 80 (1988) 891: § 1.
Praeterea [Supremum Tribunal Signaturae Apostolicae] cognoscit de
recursibus, intra terminum peremptorium triginta dierum utilium
interpositis, adversus actus administrativos singulares sive a
Dicasteriis Curiae Romanae latos sive ab ipsis probatos, quoties
contendatur num actus impugnatus legem aliquam in decernendo vel in
procedendo violaverit. § 2. In his casibus, praeter iudicium de
illegitimitate, cognoscere etiam potest, si recurrens id postulet, de
reparatione damnorum actu illegitimo illatorum. § 3. Cognoscit etiam
de aliis controversiis administrativis, quae a Romano Pontifice vel a
Romanae Curiae Dicasteriis ipsi deferantur necnon de conflictibus
competentiae inter eadem DicasteriaÂť.

[41] Secretaria Status, Rescriptum ex Audientia SS.mi Il 4 febbraio,
quo Ordinatio generalis Romanae Curiae foras datur, 30 aprilis 1999,
Regolamento generale della Curia Romana, 30 aprile 1999, art. 36 § 2,
in AAS 91 (1999) 646: ÂŤCon particolare cura sarĂ  osservato il segreto
pontificio, a norma dell'Istruzione Secreta continere del 4 febbraio
1974Âť.
Secretaria Status seu Papalis, Rescriptum ex Audientia, instructio
Secreta continere, De secreto pontificio, 4 februarii 1974, in AAS 66
(1974) 89-92:
«Art. 1.- Secreto pontificio comprehenduntur: …
4) Denuntiationes extra iudicium acceptae circa delicta contra fidem
et contra mores, et circa delicta contra Paenitentiae sacramentum
patrata, nec non processus et decisio, quae ad hasce denuntiationes
pertinent, salvo semper iure eius, qui ad auctoritatem delatus est,
cognoscendae denuntiationis, si id necessarium ad propriam defensionem
fuerit. Denuntiantis autem nomen tunc tantum patefieri licebit, cum
auctoritati opportunum videatur ut denuntiatus et is, qui eum
denuntiaverit, simul compareant; …» (p. 90).

Chyba Holy See?

Krzysztof Canucki

--