On Oct 28, 4:31 pm, Me <agnesche...@gmail.com> wrote:

"IN SEASRCH OF MEMORY, the emergence of a new science of mind " Eric
Kendel

WHAT SI NEW FOR OLD DR.KENDEL:

Dr Kendxel, if you only talked duruin g the visit to the revolution it
be caming out as yours.
Now, the way I am experiencing is that you see that new is explicit
memory of space and other
visual - spacial representation. Taking it from the biological side is
not new. Afterll all wfrom whom neuro stiudents learned all these in
teh first place? You ( standard reading)
 ( tremble by the satellite trace around me got nervous: What is that
- shot in the dark - Bushland has to do with this book, but what?
Telling him about my recovering memories spacially as external to teh
brain? Could be.
I do not apprecaite that you hidden. It is still free here. Watb is
the matter. Try to be explicit too!)

I HAVE TWO  CORRECTIONS:

1. SPACIAL CODING VIA VISULA, PRIPROCEPTIVE AND ANY OTHER RECEPTOOR
SYSTEM IS
NOT DISTRIBUTED AS THE NEURAL TRACK WOULD JUST DELIVER TO THE BRFAIN
IN TEH FORM OF \FLATTEN REFLECTION; AND IT IS NOT LOCALIZED THE SAME
WAY fREUD WANTED EITHER.

 WHILE I DO NOT HAVE A LAB TO ANSWER DETAILED ASPECTS OF IT, I KNOW
THAT SPACE IS DEFINITED;LY CODED IN 3 DIMENTIONS IN THE BRAIN AND THAT
DOES NOT NEED TRACKS
FOR THE MOIST PART; IT ACRTICATED NEURAL CENTERS SIMILARLY TO THE
MUSIC AND
IS HARDLY LOCALIZED. BUT SOME PEOPLE INSIST THAT MUSIC IS DECODED AS
LOCALIZED.

TROUBLE IS THAT LOCALIZED - NOT LOCALIZED DICHOTOMY NEEDS TO BE DEAD
BY NOW;

IT IS PERHAPS PROCESSUAL SINCE WE RECOGNIE IT IN THE MOTION ( WHILE
MUSIC "MOVES"
AS EXTERNAL WAVE; DURATION THE RECOVERY OF THE SPACIAL MEMORY OUR BODY
IS IN MOTION TILL IT HITS THAT CORRESPONDING CENTER ION  TE BRAIN; THE
OLD THEORIES DO NOT EXPLAIN HOW THIS OCCUR AT ALL.

ALSO THIS ONE BE MORE OF THE IMPLICIT MEMORY WHILE YOU CLASSIFY IT AS
EXPLICIT
( stinks Bushland that they mix external with explicit  .. stink from
doing it so many times!)

APROPOS THESE DICHOTOMIES:
IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEMORIES DO NOT CORRESPOND TO THE STRUCTURALIZED
AND PROCESSUAL MEMORIES - CRITERION ON THE FIRST IS OBJECT OF MEMORY
VERSUS ACT OF MEMORY. AND ON TE SECOND : IF THE
ROUTE AND THE READING OF THE MEMORY IS SCHEMATIZED /. STRUCTURALIZED.
tHIS DISTINCTION
NOT IN THE LITERATURE YET.

( P 130 LOCALIZATION OF MEMORIES IS CHALLENGED BY ME HERE - IT IS NOT
ACCURATE; THERE ARE NO STONED STRUCTURALIZED STRUCTURE ON MEMORIES,
WHILE " STORAGE STILL AHS A ROLE
but the London drivers store.... there acts of driving and that
posterior hypocampus inflated; in my reference on systems these
could be transient structure of processing these memories, thus we
call them captures of process not the structure; Answer is in the

next stage experiment on te drivers, when they stop driving.
Are the designated storage of the posterior hypo-campus in them will
be doing something else?

WE SURE NEED TO MOVE ON WITH THAT NEW SCIENCE BUT MUCH FASTER SINCE
THE MOPPING
TECHNIQUES AS SO PRECISE NOW; AND AS REPERTOIRE OF ACCESS TO THE
PROCESSUAL
AND STRUCTURAL BRAIN IS SUFFICIENT TO GET ALL INSIGHTS.

WHAT WE SUFFER FROM ARE:

1. THE FLAT BIAS ( LINEAR, 2 DIMENSIONAL REDUCTIONISM  THAT SOMEWHAT
HELPS THE IMAGINATION
THAT ENCODING OF MOTION WILL WANT TOL LAND IN ONE STRUCTURE ONLY,
WHILE IT DOES NOT;
THE CENTER SPECIALIZATION IN OURT THEORETICAL REFERENCE OCCURS BY
PRIMING AND THE
 FUNCTIONAL SPECIALIZATION BUT IT IS NOT LOCKED TO THESE CENTERS AT
ALL ( you do not
have enough reference on neurogenesis and plasticity that explain
these). Please talk next time to THE REVOLUTION
 I WILL BE WINDING DOWN WHILE THAT IS  BY FAR NOT THE END
OF THE ISSUES THAT NEED TOP FAST GET THAT NEW VIEW.

2. STRUCTURALIZING ANYTHING OR ELSE IN THE OLD DAYS: "MALINGERING:"
NOT REAL DISEASE' , ONLY FUNCTIONAL.
   WHILE ANY NEW USE OF BRAIN IS FIRST FUNCTIONAL AND STRUCTURALIZES
( CREATES CENTERS) AS WE USE IT.
   WHO DIOES NOT KNOW THAT YET? PUBLICATION?

    FOR READERS 0 FUNCTIONAL DISFUNCTIONS OF TEH BRAIN ARE
DISPUNCTIONS BUT THE OLD DATED CAN NOT GET THAT STRAIGHT HOW TO
DIAGNOSE IT; THE OTHER SIDE OF IT IS THAT STRUCTURE BEING O 'K DOE
SNOT GUARANTEE THAT THE USAGE DID NOT GO OFF - ISSUE HAVING ITS PLACE
IN FORENSIC MEDICINE




OTHER CONTRIBUTORS:


"Summary

Intended for introductory classes focusing on philosophy of mind,
Theories of Mind includes readings from primary sources, edited to
suit the needs of the beginner. Edited selections focus on vivid
examples and counter-examples, and meet the needs of instructors
concerned with assigning accessible primary source material that can
serve as a foundation for more advanced studies in philosophy. "
THIS TROUBLE ABOUT OTHER BOOK BY..... BUSHLAND.
What the primary source in the brain?