| Data: 2009-07-16 09:17:13 | |
| Autor: Me | |
| U nas prawniocy nie maja dna, jesli chodzi o rozpuszczanie jezorowe jeden przeciw innym, w tym wypadku przciw starszym, juz czesto prawnikom w Senacie | |
|
To jest czynnink kulturowy- u nas jes"Oliver Wendell Holmes once wisely observed that the job the lawyer is to predict what the courts will do in fact. Lawyers are paid enormous sums of money to make these predictions. Among the most salient items of information a lawyer needs to predict accurately are precisely the factors that the senators and the nominee claim should make no difference in the outcome of cases." Hey, you too - tel; it to Dershorwitz ....";But adherence to law is not what they want. They want instead to assess judges on outcome preferences and sympathies rather than law. " ................ EXACTLY HOW INCAPACITATED FOR THIS TIME IS THE LEGAL PROFESSION? HOW FRAGMENTED IS THE WORLD FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE BIG ACADEMIA. WHEN ACADEMIA WILL START TO ADHERE TO THE LAW ITSELF AND HELP THE SENATE WITH THE TRUE REALISTIC EXPERTIZE ON THE ISSUES THAT SENATE NEEDS AS THEY ARE OLDER FOR THE MOST PART THAN THE LEADING PROFESSORS IN THE GIVEN FILED. WORRY, HOW YOU SUPPLY THE EXPERTIZE TO THE SENATE WHEN NEEDED, TAHT IS NOT JUST "ACADEMIC' UNREALISTIC AND NOW GFRAGMEN TED, BUT GET OUT TO THE FILED WITH THE STUDENT AND LEARN YOURSELF. ENBOUGHT ALREDY; YOU SURE MAKE YOUR SEPARATE POINT AND YOU DO NOT MAKE SENSE OR JUSTICE TO ANYONE, AS A BUNCH THAT IS. ( WHAT THE TRIP TO MEET YOU) Nie maja dna i nie znajda go dzxis boi beda dalej manipulowac. |
|