Data: 2009-03-07 08:16:06 | |
Autor: Me | |
WHEN JUDICIARY ITSELF HAS TOO MANY LEGAL PROBLEMS FOR THE COUNTRY TO HELP THEM | |
WHEN JUDICIARY ITSELF HAS TOO MANY LEGAL PROBLEMS FOR THE COUNTRY TO HELP THEM Whom are you trying to kid in the time of crises, and at the time when responsibility for 9/11 is not even established. Who do you think you are? I AM NOT STOPPING ( was hintednow on line to stop) - YOU ARE A PART OF THE US DEMOCRATIC USA GOVERMENT - IF YOUR RULES ARE UNCLEAR FOR THAT LONG; IF YOU HAVE BECOME MANIPULATIVE TOOL OF THE PRESIDENT THAT IS GULTY OF 9/11 AND YOU INTEND TO KEEP BOUNCING OUR LAWS TO LIKINGS OF ALL GUILTY, YOU HAVEHAD BUT ONE SHOT - TO INTERNALLY SOLVE THE INTERNAL ISSUES OF THE JUDICIARY BUT NOT SPREDA AROUND THAT WHITEWASH MESS. For these People that are affected, and the rest of the Courtman and Women, that does not yet speak up. IF YOU NEED A LAWYER ECXUSE SELF FIRST, HANDICAPPED JUDICIARY. YOU HAVE CAUSED IMMENSE AMOUND OF LEGAL PRPOBLEMS THAT ARE UNLIKELY TO CLEAR YOU WHITEWASHING FASCISTS WAY.YOU HOLD ME HOSTAGE 5 Y 8 MONTS ( AND MY UNDEARAGED THAN KIDS - you are out of your mInd); TRY TO LEAVE ORDERLY TOGETHER WITH GRACEFULL GREENSBERG, BEFORE JUDGE MOCKER REALLY GETS HER). YOU OUT, HANDICAPPS, SO USA LAWS CAN STAY - YOU HAVE META PROBLEMS WITHIN YOUR JUDICIARY CONSTITUTION INYOUR HEAD, THAT IS UNSOLVABLE - TAKE IT TO GRAVE, BUT YOURS. I AM UPHOLDING aMERICAN VALUES IN THIS PROPOSED SOCIAL MOVE WHILE YOU HOLDING TO UNWORCABLE AND WRONG.I HAVE NEVER REFUSE THIRD PARTY SETTLEMENTS AND I HAVE NEVER AUTHORISED ANYBODY TO USE MYN SIGNBITURES AND NOT REVIEW WHAT YOU SIGN WITH MY SIGNITURES, plus any other probl;ems that you are making and making up. IS THAT UNDERSTOOD WHY YOU ARREE RETIRING DFAST NOW? IF NOT, HAVE YOUR LAWYER CALL ME AND NOT JUDGE MOCKER ( that is by the way against the Court rules, including the mock Court rules; you could have watcj=hed the proceedings! Try to have barberians cointained against any shoting at Judge Mocker; if you can. This STILL IS A DEMOCRACY BUT NOT IF YOU STAY LIKER THAT. For: IHT and Hillary Clinton Buttom "U.S. court erases ruling that allowed a detention By Adam Liptak Published: March 7, 2009 The Supreme Court decided Friday to erase a lower-court ruling on perhaps the most fundamental national security question: Does the president have the power to order the indefinite military detention of legal residents of the United States? The court's action, which had been urged by the Obama administration, wiped away one of the Bush administration's greatest victories in the lower courts, a 2008 ruling that expanded the limits of executive authority to combat terrorism by allowing such detentions. But the one-paragraph Supreme Court ruling leaves open the question of whether the military detention of legal residents as enemy combatants can ever be constitutional. The ruling came in the case of Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri, a citizen of Qatar who was lawfully in the United States as a student when he was arrested in 2001. The court, which had agreed to hear Marri's challenge to his detention in December, said it would not hear the case after all in light of his indictment last week on criminal charges in federal court. More significantly, the court erased the lower court ruling in the case, Al-Marri v. Spagone. Last year, in a fractured decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, Virginia, said the president had the legal authority to detain Marri, subject to a court hearing on whether he was properly designated an enemy combatant. The decision to vacate the lower court's ruling is unusual. Ordinarily, if the Supreme Court decides not to hear a case, it lets an appellate court's decision stand, thus leaving is as a precedent for the region covered by the appellate court, which in this case was the Fourth Circuit." HILLARY WOULD DO IT ALONE BY SO CALLED LEGISLATUIIVE PRIVELAGE EXTENSION, FOR WHICH SHE IS STILL TO SHOW CREDENTIALS. PRIVELEDGES SHE CAN ONLY TAKE IF SHE DOES NOT HURT THE PARTIES, IN CASE YOU DO NOT KNOW; IT IS A RISK; I PREFER TO HAVE THE PRIVELEGES WITH THE PERSONAS THAT HAVE EARNED THEM AND HAVE IT GRANTED CONSTITUTIONALLY OR BY COMMON GOOD PRACTICE. TRY NOT TO LOOK AT HER TOO LONG. HILLARY MIGHT BE DUE FOR THE TRUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL AT THIS TIME OVER THE LEGAL COMOTION SHE CAUSED TALKING THIMNGS AND PRIVELEGES, PLUS OTHER WHATEVER UNAUTHORIZED ACTIONS. YOU MIGHT NOT SIT ON THAT COUNT, IS THAT UNDERRSTOOD? Hillary also exploits Yale students with throwing extreme poisons at me - that privelege in her head you do not need too. |
|
Data: 2009-03-07 12:58:58 | |
Autor: Me | |
WHEN JUDICIARY ITSELF HAS TOO MANY LEGAL PROBLEMS FOR THE COUNTRY TO HELP THEM | |
CAN SUCH JUDICIARY NOW HELP / PERMIT CIA TO LAUGH AT OWN JOKE?
On Mar 7, 11:16 am, Me <agnesche...@gmail.com> wrote: WHEN JUDICIARY ITSELF HAS TOO MANY LEGAL PROBLEMS FOR THE COUNTRY TO |
|