Data: 2009-11-09 12:17:52 | |
Autor: Me | |
What else seems to THESAE MISREPRESENTING DC PSYCHIATRISTS! | |
The review of the book "Psychodynamic Group Psychotherapy" 4 th Edition. SUCH REVIEW IS NOT WITEN BY PSYCHIATRIST OR PSYCHOANALYST OR GROUP THERAPY SPECIALIST FOR THAT MATTER, AS THE TITTLE OF THE SAID BOOK CALLS. IT IS WRITTEN BY PHD PSYCHIATRIC I NTERN; GUESS WHAT - THERE ARE NO SUCH INTERNS; AS THE GRADUTES OF PHD CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY CALLS SELF PRAUDLY 'PSYCHOLOGISTS' AND PSYCHIATRIST AS THIS ONE WANNA BE , DO NOT YET HAVE PHD. FROM THESE PARTICULAR INTERNS POSITIONS IT SEEMS THAT COMPATING SHORT TERM THERAPY THAT BY DEFINITION IS NOT PSYCHOANALYTIC WITH "THE COMPEMENTARY RUTAN TEXT" MAKE LOGICAL SENSE ( AND MORE THE LIKE) (now my transference allows to call them not only indolent - plain idiots in the world that does not diffentiate indolence and they might pass!) You can skip the rest - the reviewer is inciopetent in the subgjecvt matter that hye takes on; he only wanna be interested in group therapy - it not one yet; but reviewes book that supposinmjgly summarizes clinical practice. ( WIECEJ NA SOC CULT USA) ( I AM STILL HAVING TRANSFERENCES , REGARDLESS, - WASHINGTON DC INTELECTUALS SEEM TO BE OBLIVIEUS AND DO NOT REPOND TO DEMONSTRTIVE INDOLENCFE AAND... IT IS FLOADING HERE) AND NOW THE JEST: There was no editions of such book! mThere was a small brochure only that did not gto through professional scrutiny; there is no good book on topic except bordering one by B. Cohen, tat surely these reviewers will not understand either ( that in temting case to do more of teh same) |
|
Data: 2009-11-09 13:16:58 | |
Autor: Me | |
What else seems to THESAE MISREPRESENTING DC PSYCHIATRISTS! | |
What else seems to "him", the INTERN? ( do not look at him too long!) He review of the book "Psychodynamic Group Psychotherapy" 4 th Edition. ( other reviews of this book are not referenced here) SUCH REVIEW IS NOT WRITTEN BY PSYCHIATRIST OR PSYCHOANALYST OR GROUP THERAPY SPECIALIST FOR THAT MATTER, AS THE TITTLE OF THE SAID BOOK CALLS. IT IS WRITTEN BY PHD PSYCHIATRIC INTERN; GUESS WHAT - THERE ARE NO SUCH INTERNS; AS THE GRADUATES OF PHD CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY CALLS SELF PROUDLY 'PSYCHOLOGISTS' AND PSYCHIATRIST AS THIS ONE WANNA BE , DO NOT YET HAVE PHD; they are on duty as residents and prescribe medications and as such call self MDs in USA. IN USA IT IS NOT OVERNIGHT RESIDENCE - IT IS YEARS OF MEDICAL STATUS ARE RESIDENT INTERN. THESE DOCTORS ARE INTRODUCED TO THE PATIENTS CORRECTLY WITH THE PROPER INSTITUTIONAL PROCEDURE AND MOST OFTEN REFEREED AS "DOCTORS" THEY HAVE TO HAVE SUPERVISORS, AS OPPOSE THE INDEPENDENT LICENSED CONSULTING PRACTITIONERS.IN THIS CASE RESIDENT INTERN HAS NO BUSINESS NOT TO CHECK THE CONTENT WITH HIS SUPERVISOR ( FOR BOTH SAKE AND FOR THE SAKE OF THE PROFESSION), HOWEVER INTERPRETATION OF THIS COMPELLING MIGHT WARY - THE EDITOR LISTED IN "PSYCHIATRY" 72/3/FALL 2009 IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTENT. ( in the field that is ethical - this would read that way - even thought my hospital does not require that i submit my writings for the review of my supervisor, it is wise to check as I affect the profession; but if the resident used patients in the institution where is supervisor is than is compelled to go through the supervisor. in this case - resident intern admits that he barely thought of group therapy" ( not even that he committed it, which might be correct). HE FOR A CHANGE USES MD TITLE. FROM THESE PARTICULAR INTERNS POSITIONS IT SEEMS THAT COMPARING SHORT TERM THERAPY THAT BY DEFINITION IS NOT PSYCHOANALYTIC WITH "THE COMPLEMENTARY RUTAN TEXT" MAKE LOGICAL SENSE ( AND MORE THE LIKE) (now my transference allows to call them not only indolent - plain idiots in the world that does not differentiate indolence and they might pass!) You can skip the rest - the reviewer is incompetent in the subject matter that he takes on; he only wanna be interested in group therapy - it not one yet; but reviews book that supposedly summarizes clinical practice. ( I AM STILL HAVING TRANSFERENCE , REGARDLESS, - WASHINGTON DC INTELLECTUALS SEEM TO BE OBLIVIOUS AND DO NOT RESPOND TO DEMONSTRATIVE INDOLENCE AND... IT IS FLOATING HERE) ( AND TEHRE IS MORE - IN WASHINGTON DC THIS SI NOT ONLY ONE PROFESSION THAT CAN GET THIS KIND OF CONSOLIDATED REPRESENTATION IN PUBLIC AND DOS NOT EVEN GET CALLED ON WHY? CULTURE FACTOR - DEFINITELY; LOW ETHICS - YOU BET, BUT IN LOW ETHNICS ENVIRON CRIMINALS HAVE SOLIDARITY; NOT HERE! SO WHAT ARE THESE?DEPLETED PROFESSIONAL CULTURE BY SUBVERTING TO POLITICS THAT FOR PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY IS UNETHICAL AND ILLEGAL.FOR OTHERS - I SEE AND AM SHY TO STATE - BLENDED MINDS, LACK OF EDUCATION REGARDLESS SHOW MANY STUPID DISPUTES RUN THROUGH - THEY ARE NOT TOUCHING THE ESSENCE OF MATTER FOR THE MOST PART AS THE POLITICS RULE - "HOW THIS CAN BE USED ONLY, WHETHER LEGAL , ETHICAL OR NOT; NOT EVEN CHECKED IF LAW VIOLATED OR CULTURE LAXED LIKE IN THIS ISSUE OF "PSYCHIATRY" ON A WHILE PEOPLES PROFESSIONS DEVELOP OWN BAROMETER FOR THESE MATTERS AND MORE OFTEN THAN N OT IN THE CORRUPTED ENVIRON GET IRONIC AND HYPOCRITICAL; HERE THEY SELL VIEWS ROM IDIOTIC INDOLENCE PLANE, AND DO NOT EVEN GET BUSTED. AND NOW THE JEST: There was no editions of such book! There was a small brochure only that did not to through professional scrutiny; there is no good book on topic except bordering one by B. Cohen, tat surely these reviewers will not understand either ( that in tempting case to do more of the same) ( and now public secret - only Bushland is suspect of this culture here, but I am drawing big warning over the rest; WHO IS THIS REST? WHY AREN'T YOU CONFRONTING INDOLENCE, INCOMPETENCE MIXED WITH C ORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY? also , before Condi R was making up the questions to get posted and answered right; now - not.) |
|