WIKIPEDIA GETS EDITED LIKE THAT; BOTH OWNER AND THE OTHER
CONTRIBUTORS IN WIKIPEDIA DECIDE THAT. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT THE
SCIENCE AUTHORITY; IT NEVER CAN, BUT HIS GREAT DATA COLLECTION
EVEN OUT TO THE LEVEL OF CONSUMER, A LOT MIS-STATEMENTS AND UNCHECKED
INFORMATION, ESPECIALLY THE ONE THAT REQIRES SPECIALISATION, THAT IS
CONFIDENTIAL BUT SOMEONE VIOLATE THAT AS NON- SPECIALIST AND THAT
REQUIRES TRAINED MIND.

ENCYCLOPEDIA FOR EVERYONE BY EVERYONE MIGHT HAVE PERHAPS REACHED ITS
LIMIT THIS WAY ( the confidential information needs to be asserted -
not in Wikipedia)

SAMPLE OF WIKIPEDIA TROUBLE HERE ( IT WOULD BE JUIST FUNNY IF THAT WAS
COMMEDY CHANNEL; FOR SOME THIS IS SOURCE AND THEY DO DISTORT A LOT
WHILE PUTTING THE RERGULAR DATA INTO RANDOMITY OF ALL SORTS), SEE:

Randomization From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Randomization is the process of making something random; this means:

Generating a random permutation of a sequence (such as when shuffling
cards).
Selecting a random sample of a population (important in statistical
sampling).
Generating random numbers: see Random number generation.
Transforming a data stream (such as when using a scrambler in
telecommunications).
...............

AND THAN WE HAVE THE EDITORIAL WRITTER AT NYT THAT IS NOT KNOW FOR
BEING A SCIENCE WRITER ADDIDING TO THIS INDOLENCE AS IF BY SCIENCE:
( NYT editor is hacker on my line and just managed to remove the quate
from my brawser)
Can not quote. He say that all sort of randomizations in several
disciplines of our live is great, himself not understanding what
randomiozation is ( if you using me as information be aware that in
both clasic experiment and post-factotum procedures it means conter-
balancing for the captured system insufficiencies by designing the
sheddow pattern correcting for it; it comes to place not only during
the initial recruitment of the representative for the whole reseach
subjects or items, but later in the procedure when the insufficiency
occurs).

First the editor uses the redundance: 'controlled experiment'; Hallo -
experiment is
always controlled ( see - you can not even start; leave it to
scientists; but I get that
large audiences are already involved in a lot non- controlled things,
that they, the
morons will later call 'experiments'  and win as they sure control
that:))

This NYT genius takes on himself to tell large audiences that
'randomization' the
one that he does not understand, abolishes theories. Than rest I have
already seen
- total morons remove good result fromscience beacuse they can not
make bombs
with it. I rest here!
 ( spell problem made by hackers)

mozna poprosic o streszczenie w 1 zdaniu ?

--
pozdrawiam
P.L.U.T.O.N.: Positronic Lifeform Used for Troubleshooting and Online
Nullification

On Apr 27, 11:33 am, "pluton" <zielonadu...@gazeta.pl> wrote:

mozna poprosic o streszczenie w 1 zdaniu ?

--
pozdrawiam
P.L.U.T.O.N.: Positronic Lifeform Used for Troubleshooting and Online
Nullification

NAUKA ZE SWOJEJ NATURY JEST DZIALANOSCIA OBJECTYWNA, DOZY DO
PELNEGO OBRAZU SWIATA EZTELNYMI METODAMI, PODCZAS GDY POLITYKOWANIE
ROBI
NIEMAL ODWROTNIE   I , PROSZE PANA, NIE DA SIE ISC W OBIE STRONY W TYM
SAMYM CZASIE.

PROSZE NAPISAC DO MNIE JEST MA PAN WIECEJ PYTAN - PEWNIE O
RANDOMIZACJI - TO JEST
ROZUMIENIE CALEGO SYSTEMU WPIERW I POPRAWIANIE WYTWORZONYCH DZIUR
PRZEZ
PRZYBLIZANY( W KIERUNKU MODELOWEGO) NABOR KANDYDATOW DO BADAN; ALBO
INNYCH
 ELEMETOW METODY EXPERYMENTALNE OR EX POST FACTOTUM. ( TO DLA
STUDENTOW - ONI MAJA
TO ZROZUMIEC W BAKALORATOWYCH STUDIACJ ZANIM ZABIORA SIE ZA POWAZNE
BADANIA)

( u nas jest tajemnica - moze ok polowa Philozofow juz tego nie
pojmuje tez, prosze
nie czuc sie osamotnionym ; a tez absolutnie nikt nie jest im winien)