Reszta dyskusji z Tracey na soc culture USA



       ( sorry this essay still has some intrusions from the
oppositional personalities supervising me illegally, just tom disturb
the writing  often not understanding
much, CIA being a suspect)


I AM INCONSISTANT TOO – I want to cuddle Tracey while I do not need
it; and while I promiss4ds that the last war was ended at the last
post.


That is my acceptance seeking pacifying      while i only needed to
report the matter of factly that  what I am bringing up at the SCINCE
REVOLUTION is


 the STRUCTURAL BIAS


 for which Tracey AND PERHAPS ALL PRINCTONIANS ARE GOING TO FIGHT
CATCH AND DOGS FROM NOW ON AND FOR EVER ( IF CONSISTANT)

      I do not mind – I use it now.

For me it seems that conceptual error of Tracey is in a question she
asked herself
1.where do we find neurogenesis and than trying to get it by step by
step 9 inductive penetration of brain, so to say, lending the
reductionistic effect.

   Tracey needed the concept first and not journey into brain the way
she did as the first
 hit to hippocampus as she lies there affects the next dive into the
next structure
and she neglects to account  for that ( this is a white lie but lie OK
–if you want to
fight it – we’ll get there)

IF  SHE LOOKDED AT THE NATURE ( or deeper into the subject matter
without nature far reaching analogies but just at the human brain
conditions as dynamic evolving living organ that is interdependent)
AND GRASPED THE CONCEPT FIRST
( AS RATHER DEDUCTIVE; OR COMPROMISED TAKE ON FROM THE OBSERVED FIELD
SHE TRUES TO CAPTURE SHE WOUDL NOT COMMIT THIS REDUCTIONINSTIC ERROR
BUT NOT FREE OF TRAP ON THE DEDUCTIVE SIDE EITHER

     ( in my science I resolved that dilemma)


       ( BUSHLND , you upsetting me distorting my writing – I am
trying to be just disputing biases; I am cutting you a slack; please
cooperate and  jus be oppositional
child-like , please )


/I am inconsistent since the Bushland   breaks my heart taking
everything there is
about concepts now, while we in the community know that it is hard to
get
that motivated. /

PLEASE USE HER EXAMPLE: it is ethical to do it - all information  from
the public;
she put it in public. Public information can be Disputed publicly –
scientific information when published is public.

When I get sadistic to PU I ask how the birds knew not to go that far
as Tracey
does and did very well in practice( this could be not offensive of
scientist already adopted Renasans  approach at which is completely
understood that nature knows the patterns that we only become
gradually aware off; lets respect both ends of this spectrum;\
THIS WAS AT THE IDEA OF MY CONCEPT FOR THE VIRGINIA SCIENCE CENTER FOR
SCIENTISTS GIVEN OUT IN NOVEMBER 2006; since than i am harassed in the
tantamount fashion by CIA as it seems and do not receive even a cent
for 1 1/2 years, going to the field as I wanted scientists to do in
teams; with the satellites FROM  ALL LEADING UNIVERSITIES TOO , and I
get results ( REPORTED IN THE INTERNET AS  THE FIRST VIRRTUAL;
UNIVERSITY).

Doing it I have overcame many issues and biases that current science
has.
( that is perhaps idea of Edison or earlier scientists, often called
naturalists, but I do not pronounce self as such; I pronounce that I
look for the nature paradigm and to large extend already understand
it; that is the same parading that governs our social life – I derived
paradigm from the group dynamic and not the other way around – nature
groups and networks too processing its energies – my theory allows to
discover and understand relationships on this level of process)

        ( SOMEONE IMMEDIATELY – CORRECT TO “nature fgroups” Wrong, if
so we F group if we force anything rather than derive. It is true –
please try to understand better effects of your interventions in the
nature.

I have phenomenological discovered unattended relationships in
sciences,.
ME AND MY SCIENCE TEAMS ON SATELLITES ALONE DID VERY WELL
( see other headings)

I have also pronounced my own Theory of Process  in the Philosophy
( not the
one everybody can get but the true novel Theory nobody can get till I
train in my
\School - that is what novel means, Bushland) ; I have developed
completely new method of science findings and interpretation. WE ALL
NEED TO OPEN STATIONARY UNIVERSITY BUT OBAMA WHO WANTS MY
 SCIENCE THINKS THAT IS FUNNY ( he locked self in - it is funny what
the
nature is going to do to you if you do not listen and follow the
findings in the
 filed where we created trends already; we will survive in the filed
without
a cent but not you or your philosophy, FUNNY BIF MEN; Obama has
knocked
me of from my job site illegally ( WAS NOT EMPEROR WHEN HE DID THAT
THUS NOT COVERED BY HIS  EMPERER'S LAW) and really thinks that
harassing that bad is funny - that WAYNE of own joke)

…

Army also misses on information that nature order is already
optimized, and unyielding
to such news. AT THE REVOLUITION WE WILL MAKE ARMY RESPECT BTEH
NATURE,
EVENTUALLY.