Grupy dyskusyjne   »   pl.soc.polityka   »   poprawione: recenzja w 'Psychiatry' 72/3 fall 2009

poprawione: recenzja w 'Psychiatry' 72/3 fall 2009

Data: 2009-11-09 13:18:36
Autor: Me
poprawione: recenzja w 'Psychiatry' 72/3 fall 2009


                 What else seems to "him", the INTERN?


                           ( do not look at him too long!)


He review of the book "Psychodynamic Group Psychotherapy" 4 th
Edition.

    ( other reviews of this book are not referenced here)

SUCH REVIEW IS NOT WRITTEN BY PSYCHIATRIST OR PSYCHOANALYST
OR GROUP THERAPY SPECIALIST FOR THAT MATTER, AS THE TITTLE OF THE
SAID BOOK CALLS.

IT IS WRITTEN BY PHD PSYCHIATRIC INTERN; GUESS WHAT - THERE ARE NO
SUCH INTERNS; AS THE GRADUATES OF PHD CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY CALLS
SELF PROUDLY 'PSYCHOLOGISTS' AND PSYCHIATRIST AS THIS ONE WANNA BE ,
DO NOT YET HAVE PHD; they are on duty as residents and prescribe
medications
and as such call self MDs in USA. IN USA IT IS NOT OVERNIGHT RESIDENCE
-
IT IS YEARS OF MEDICAL STATUS ARE RESIDENT INTERN. THESE DOCTORS
ARE INTRODUCED TO THE PATIENTS CORRECTLY WITH THE PROPER
INSTITUTIONAL PROCEDURE AND MOST OFTEN REFEREED AS "DOCTORS"
THEY HAVE TO HAVE SUPERVISORS, AS OPPOSE THE INDEPENDENT
LICENSED CONSULTING PRACTITIONERS.IN THIS CASE RESIDENT INTERN
HAS NO BUSINESS NOT TO CHECK THE CONTENT WITH HIS SUPERVISOR
 ( FOR BOTH SAKE AND FOR THE SAKE OF THE PROFESSION), HOWEVER
INTERPRETATION OF THIS COMPELLING MIGHT WARY - THE EDITOR
LISTED IN "PSYCHIATRY" 72/3/FALL 2009 IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTENT.
( in the field that is ethical - this would read that way - even
thought my hospital does
not require that i submit my writings for the review of my supervisor,
it is wise to check
as I affect the profession; but if the resident used  patients in the
institution where is
 supervisor is than is compelled to go through the supervisor.
in this case - resident intern admits that he barely thought of group
therapy"
( not even that he committed it,  which might be correct).
HE FOR A CHANGE USES MD TITLE.

FROM THESE PARTICULAR INTERNS POSITIONS IT SEEMS THAT COMPARING SHORT
TERM THERAPY  THAT BY DEFINITION IS NOT PSYCHOANALYTIC WITH "THE
COMPLEMENTARY RUTAN TEXT" MAKE LOGICAL SENSE (  AND MORE THE LIKE)

 (now my transference allows to call them not only indolent - plain
idiots in the world that does not differentiate indolence and they
might
pass!)

You can skip the rest - the reviewer is incompetent in the subject
matter that he takes on; he only wanna be interested in group therapy
-
it not one yet; but reviews book that supposedly summarizes clinical
practice.

( I AM STILL HAVING TRANSFERENCE , REGARDLESS, - WASHINGTON DC
INTELLECTUALS SEEM TO BE OBLIVIOUS AND DO NOT RESPOND TO
DEMONSTRATIVE INDOLENCE AND... IT IS FLOATING HERE)

  ( AND TEHRE IS MORE - IN WASHINGTON DC THIS SI NOT ONLY ONE
PROFESSION THAT
CAN GET THIS KIND OF CONSOLIDATED REPRESENTATION IN PUBLIC AND DOS
NOT
EVEN GET CALLED ON WHY? CULTURE FACTOR - DEFINITELY; LOW ETHICS - YOU
BET,
BUT IN LOW ETHNICS ENVIRON CRIMINALS HAVE SOLIDARITY; NOT HERE! SO
WHAT
ARE THESE?DEPLETED PROFESSIONAL CULTURE BY SUBVERTING TO POLITICS THAT
FOR
PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY IS  UNETHICAL AND ILLEGAL.FOR OTHERS
- I SEE AND AM SHY TO STATE - BLENDED MINDS, LACK OF EDUCATION
REGARDLESS SHOW MANY STUPID  DISPUTES RUN THROUGH - THEY ARE
NOT TOUCHING THE ESSENCE OF MATTER FOR THE MOST PART AS
THE POLITICS RULE - "HOW THIS CAN BE USED ONLY, WHETHER LEGAL ,
ETHICAL OR NOT; NOT EVEN CHECKED IF LAW VIOLATED OR CULTURE LAXED LIKE
IN THIS ISSUE OF "PSYCHIATRY"
ON A WHILE PEOPLES PROFESSIONS DEVELOP OWN BAROMETER FOR THESE
MATTERS AND MORE OFTEN THAN N OT IN THE CORRUPTED ENVIRON GET IRONIC
AND HYPOCRITICAL; HERE THEY SELL  VIEWS ROM IDIOTIC INDOLENCE PLANE,
AND DO NOT EVEN GET BUSTED.


 AND NOW THE JEST:

There was no editions of such book! There was a small brochure only
that did not to through professional scrutiny; there is no good book
on topic except bordering one by B. Cohen, tat surely these reviewers
will not understand either ( that in tempting case to do more of the
same)

  ( and now public secret - only Bushland is suspect of this culture
here, but
   I am drawing big warning over the rest; WHO IS THIS REST? WHY
AREN'T
 YOU CONFRONTING INDOLENCE, INCOMPETENCE  MIXED WITH
CORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY? also , before Condi R was making up the
 questions to get posted and answered right; now - not.)

poprawione: recenzja w 'Psychiatry' 72/3 fall 2009

Nowy film z video.banzaj.pl więcej »
Redmi 9A - recenzja budżetowego smartfona